Tools & Wizards About Us
w3care.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 12

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

w3care.com

W3care Technologies Pvt. Ltd. | Web & Mobile Apps Development Company USA

Page Load Speed

17 sec in total

First Response

142 ms

Resources Loaded

16.6 sec

Page Rendered

289 ms

w3care.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to w3care.com homepage info - get ready to check W3care best content for Hong Kong right away, or after learning these important things about w3care.com

W3care is a custom web and an app development offshore outsource company in Seattle USA. We offer software, web design and app development services to clients in USA and across the world.

Visit w3care.com

Key Findings

We analyzed W3care.com page load time and found that the first response time was 142 ms and then it took 16.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

w3care.com performance score

12

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,770 ms

10/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.174

1/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.1 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

w3care.com

142 ms

www.w3care.com

237 ms

cd241391a6175c9e72d79c19664f97415b64cc13.1458211536.css

71 ms

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

106 ms

index-slider.css

67 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original W3care.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Facebook.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (15.4 sec) belongs to the original domain W3care.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 305.9 kB (19%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of W3care.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 38.2 kB

  • Original 47.2 kB
  • After minification 44.4 kB
  • After compression 8.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 34.2 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. W3care images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 168.5 kB

  • Original 261.7 kB
  • After minification 244.7 kB
  • After compression 93.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 168.5 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 65.0 kB

  • Original 81.9 kB
  • After minification 79.9 kB
  • After compression 16.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. W3care.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 65.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (39%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

39

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of W3care. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

w3care.com

w3care.com

142 ms

www.w3care.com

www.w3care.com

237 ms

cd241391a6175c9e72d79c19664f97415b64cc13.1458211536.css

cd241391a6175c9e72d79c19664f97415b64cc13.1458211536.css

71 ms

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

106 ms

index-slider.css

index-slider.css

67 ms

39c06dd3af665296e8968c5348d88dcfcefbad4e.1444371583.js

39c06dd3af665296e8968c5348d88dcfcefbad4e.1444371583.js

77 ms

5346e356efe96f20c463df810f203ff0a4a2fab6.1441349304.js

5346e356efe96f20c463df810f203ff0a4a2fab6.1441349304.js

78 ms

jquery.mmenu.css

jquery.mmenu.css

67 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

179 ms

jquery.flexslider.js

jquery.flexslider.js

193 ms

all.js

all.js

165 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

166 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

111 ms

bg1.jpg

bg1.jpg

124 ms

brand-mob.png

brand-mob.png

120 ms

phonehook_c.png

phonehook_c.png

121 ms

ind-flag.jpg

ind-flag.jpg

122 ms

contact-bg.png

contact-bg.png

123 ms

usa-flag.jpg

usa-flag.jpg

124 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

225 ms

hiring.png

hiring.png

225 ms

EE2banner1_3.png

EE2banner1_3.png

350 ms

learnmore_8.png

learnmore_8.png

225 ms

banner52.jpg

banner52.jpg

227 ms

mob-app-banner31.jpg

mob-app-banner31.jpg

229 ms

overview-btn_9.png

overview-btn_9.png

226 ms

banner-img_5.jpg

banner-img_5.jpg

443 ms

button_d.png

button_d.png

228 ms

banner5-new1.png

banner5-new1.png

475 ms

learn-more_08.png

learn-more_08.png

291 ms

w3care-banner-reponsive.jpg

w3care-banner-reponsive.jpg

387 ms

services.png

services.png

382 ms

title-bg.png

title-bg.png

381 ms

title-bg-blue.png

title-bg-blue.png

433 ms

web-design.png

web-design.png

448 ms

web-dev.png

web-dev.png

448 ms

web-app.png

web-app.png

456 ms

img-shadow.png

img-shadow.png

486 ms

logo_3c199c8543a7cd1f10472d5e386f64d1.png

logo_3c199c8543a7cd1f10472d5e386f64d1.png

519 ms

bmg-logo_9.png

bmg-logo_9.png

520 ms

smelluscious-logo.png

smelluscious-logo.png

540 ms

7greenlights-logo.jpg

7greenlights-logo.jpg

550 ms

logo-2.png

logo-2.png

564 ms

logo.png

logo.png

578 ms

movietowne-logo.png

movietowne-logo.png

629 ms

img_26092014_162720-3.png

img_26092014_162720-3.png

603 ms

yamnuska-logo.png

yamnuska-logo.png

515 ms

144915467099646.jpg

144915467099646.jpg

521 ms

collect

collect

109 ms

roboto-regular-webfont.woff

roboto-regular-webfont.woff

15448 ms

roboto-condensed-webfont.woff

roboto-condensed-webfont.woff

15292 ms

up-arrow-testi.png

up-arrow-testi.png

15201 ms

copyright-bg.png

copyright-bg.png

15263 ms

next-prev.png

next-prev.png

15325 ms

button.c44c2dc193c555561d5830b3b543eb26.js

button.c44c2dc193c555561d5830b3b543eb26.js

204 ms

211 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

119 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

175 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

72 ms

tweet_button.781f4f0ed6951ea86890554cec78adec.en.html

tweet_button.781f4f0ed6951ea86890554cec78adec.en.html

80 ms

jot

jot

90 ms

jot

jot

89 ms

ping

ping

58 ms

controls.png

controls.png

64 ms

like.php

like.php

104 ms

like.php

like.php

109 ms

qeKvIRsJabD.js

qeKvIRsJabD.js

140 ms

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

146 ms

qeKvIRsJabD.js

qeKvIRsJabD.js

54 ms

Accessibility Review

w3care.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

w3care.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

w3care.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise W3care.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that W3care.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

w3care.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of W3care. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: