2.2 sec in total
610 ms
1.4 sec
169 ms
Click here to check amazing Walk In Tub Reviews content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about walk-in-tub-reviews.com
What do Walk in Tubs Cost? What's the Best Walk in Tub? Get Walk in Bathtub Reviews and Complete Company Ratings
Visit walk-in-tub-reviews.comWe analyzed Walk-in-tub-reviews.com page load time and found that the first response time was 610 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
walk-in-tub-reviews.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.2 s
99/100
10%
Value1.2 s
100/100
25%
Value1.7 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.2 s
100/100
10%
610 ms
113 ms
139 ms
38 ms
171 ms
Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Walk-in-tub-reviews.com, 13% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (610 ms) belongs to the original domain Walk-in-tub-reviews.com.
Page size can be reduced by 401.4 kB (59%)
683.8 kB
282.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Walk-in-tub-reviews.com main page is 683.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 431.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Walk In Tub Reviews images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 295.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 295.8 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 84.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Walk-in-tub-reviews.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 84.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (55%)
22
10
The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Walk In Tub Reviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
walk-in-tub-reviews.com
610 ms
calendar.css
113 ms
front.css
139 ms
mootools-yui-compressed.js
38 ms
core.js
171 ms
caption.js
168 ms
mootools-more.js
342 ms
script.js
168 ms
system.css
195 ms
general.css
211 ms
template.css
285 ms
jquery.js
383 ms
script.js
298 ms
system.css
80 ms
analytics.js
38 ms
menuseparator.png
115 ms
header.png
117 ms
walk%20in%20tub%20reviews.jpg
190 ms
cost%20of%20walk%20in%20tubs.jpg
189 ms
best%20walk%20in%20tub%20-%20august%202012.png
281 ms
gatherbidslogosmall225.png
123 ms
collect
11 ms
collect
3 ms
walk-in-tub-reviews.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
walk-in-tub-reviews.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
walk-in-tub-reviews.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Walk-in-tub-reviews.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Walk-in-tub-reviews.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
walk-in-tub-reviews.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Walk In Tub Reviews. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: