12.8 sec in total
Click here to check amazing Wallmarker content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wallmarker.in
We're the top Interior Designers in Thalassery & Kannur. We are a creative interior designing company for interior design and interior decoration services.Visit wallmarker.in
We analyzed Wallmarker.in page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 11.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
wallmarker.in performance score
Our browser made a total of 173 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (102 requests) were addressed to the original Wallmarker.in, 16% (28 requests) were made to Google.com and 12% (21 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Wallmarker.in.
Page size can be reduced by 263.8 kB (9%)
In fact, the total size of Wallmarker.in main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 134.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 134.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wallmarker images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 84.8 kB
Number of requests can be reduced by 75 (51%)
wallmarker.in accessibility score
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
wallmarker.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
Serves images with low resolution
wallmarker.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Links do not have descriptive text
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wallmarker.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wallmarker.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wallmarker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: