664 ms in total
55 ms
527 ms
82 ms
Welcome to waterfront.band homepage info - get ready to check Waterfront best content right away, or after learning these important things about waterfront.band
Visit waterfront.bandWe analyzed Waterfront.band page load time and found that the first response time was 55 ms and then it took 609 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
waterfront.band performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
89/100
10%
Value4.4 s
39/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value560 ms
52/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value8.0 s
42/100
10%
55 ms
30 ms
29 ms
69 ms
97 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Waterfront.band, 46% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 32% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (258 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 210.6 kB (40%)
524.2 kB
313.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Waterfront.band main page is 524.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 279.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 207.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 207.9 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Waterfront images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (53%)
19
9
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Waterfront. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.waterfront.band
55 ms
minified.js
30 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
29 ms
polyfill.min.js
69 ms
thunderbolt-commons.2113c4aa.bundle.min.js
97 ms
main.6c492079.bundle.min.js
95 ms
lodash.min.js
93 ms
react.production.min.js
94 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
98 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
98 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
111 ms
85a981_ffcb0ba2aae14652b52d9e391065e2abf000.jpg
227 ms
bundle.min.js
52 ms
3%20(1).png
195 ms
f5c4f2_c16f9d224883475795532b353b9c2906f000.jpg
258 ms
14102493_1043361095713605_5958729450713846716_n.jpg
233 ms
123 ms
116 ms
110 ms
122 ms
111 ms
120 ms
161 ms
163 ms
161 ms
156 ms
162 ms
164 ms
80de9d5d-ab5f-40ce-911b-104e51e93d7c.woff
9 ms
LuloCleanW05-OneBold.woff
8 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
6 ms
bolt-performance
32 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
8 ms
right-arrow.svg
9 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
3 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
7 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
7 ms
waterfront.band accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
waterfront.band best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
waterfront.band SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Waterfront.band can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Waterfront.band main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
waterfront.band
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Waterfront. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: