Report Summary

  • 91

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    18% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    22% of websites

wcrw.com

Waxman's Carpet and Rug Warehouse wcrw.com

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

245 ms

Resources Loaded

760 ms

Page Rendered

1.7 sec

wcrw.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Wcrw content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wcrw.com

Large online and in-store area rug selection to choose from at everyday low prices.

Visit wcrw.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wcrw.com page load time and found that the first response time was 245 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wcrw.com performance score

91

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

74/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.0 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.014

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.3 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wcrw.com

245 ms

button7.jpg

72 ms

button1.jpg

77 ms

button4.jpg

72 ms

buttonA.jpg

74 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Wcrw.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Waxmansrugs.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (447 ms) belongs to the original domain Wcrw.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 148.3 kB (6%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Wcrw.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 85.0 kB

  • Original 101.3 kB
  • After minification 98.0 kB
  • After compression 16.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 63.2 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wcrw images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (8%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

67

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wcrw. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

wcrw.com accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

wcrw.com best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

wcrw.com SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wcrw.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wcrw.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wcrw. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: