7 sec in total
324 ms
6.4 sec
257 ms
Click here to check amazing W Duffy content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wduffy.co.uk
Glasgow based web developer with over 20 years experience developing on C# and javascript platforms using .net mvc, .net web api .net webforms and vue.js.
Visit wduffy.co.ukWe analyzed Wduffy.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 324 ms and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
wduffy.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.5 s
95/100
10%
Value2.3 s
94/100
25%
Value1.5 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.028
100/100
15%
Value2.3 s
99/100
10%
324 ms
1914 ms
408 ms
321 ms
365 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Wduffy.co.uk, 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to 1.gravatar.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Wduffy.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 103.5 kB (49%)
212.1 kB
108.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Wduffy.co.uk main page is 212.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 112.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.9 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 470 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. W Duffy images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 61.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 61.1 kB or 55% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wduffy.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 22.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (44%)
27
15
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of W Duffy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wduffy.co.uk
324 ms
www.wduffy.co.uk
1914 ms
style.css
408 ms
nav.css
321 ms
posts.css
365 ms
home.css
395 ms
jquery.jcarousel.css
389 ms
jquery.js
703 ms
dropdowns.js
1148 ms
contact.js
3439 ms
jquery.jcarousel.pack.js
3618 ms
wp-syntax.css
1043 ms
b4e1e9f8bb72205c786a888b907e7042
137 ms
bg_top.jpg
161 ms
bg_flare.jpg
218 ms
bg_nav.gif
135 ms
bg_latest.jpg
554 ms
bubble.gif
287 ms
bg_headline.gif
341 ms
bg_button.gif
345 ms
bg_sidebar.jpg
357 ms
socialbutton_rss.gif
369 ms
bg_module.jpg
434 ms
socialbutton_linkedin.gif
499 ms
socialbutton_twitter.gif
576 ms
socialbutton_flickr.gif
644 ms
bg_middle.jpg
604 ms
bg_footer.jpg
593 ms
bg_flare_bottom.jpg
725 ms
ga.js
30 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
print.css
116 ms
wduffy.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
wduffy.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
wduffy.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wduffy.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wduffy.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wduffy.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of W Duffy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: