Tools & Wizards About Us
web-fx.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

web-fx.com

Let's Get You Started with Affordable Web Hosting! | WEB FX llc

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

42 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

183 ms

web-fx.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Web FX content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about web-fx.com

Home of affordable web hosting, web design & development, graphics, SEO, analytics, WordPress, custom websites, woocommerce, & ecommerce.

Visit web-fx.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Web-fx.com page load time and found that the first response time was 42 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

web-fx.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

20/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.2 s

30/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value700 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

web-fx.com

42 ms

web-fx.com

913 ms

formidableforms.css

13 ms

font-awesome.min.css

19 ms

slick.css

12 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Web-fx.com, 8% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (913 ms) belongs to the original domain Web-fx.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 175.2 kB (14%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Web-fx.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 466.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 111.7 kB

  • Original 130.3 kB
  • After minification 129.4 kB
  • After compression 18.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 111.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 63 B

  • Original 466.2 kB
  • After minification 466.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web FX images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 57.0 kB

  • Original 411.9 kB
  • After minification 411.9 kB
  • After compression 354.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 57.0 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 6.4 kB

  • Original 212.2 kB
  • After minification 212.2 kB
  • After compression 205.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Web-fx.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (63%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web FX. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

web-fx.com

web-fx.com

42 ms

web-fx.com

web-fx.com

913 ms

formidableforms.css

formidableforms.css

13 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

19 ms

slick.css

slick.css

12 ms

wtwp-public.css

wtwp-public.css

11 ms

style.css

style.css

21 ms

5cfaa203a24dd5818d51ae74a24ecc14.min.css

5cfaa203a24dd5818d51ae74a24ecc14.min.css

32 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

23 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

29 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

145 ms

tracker.js

tracker.js

21 ms

js

js

150 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

19 ms

e1e095b68309498ceb70afb48894521d.min.js

e1e095b68309498ceb70afb48894521d.min.js

144 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

68 ms

webfx-250x141-1.jpg

webfx-250x141-1.jpg

47 ms

hacker2-400x600-1.jpg

hacker2-400x600-1.jpg

48 ms

img.webp

img.webp

49 ms

imaintech-800x428-1.jpg

imaintech-800x428-1.jpg

47 ms

serverroom-600x401-1.png

serverroom-600x401-1.png

48 ms

awb-icons.woff

awb-icons.woff

43 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

43 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

43 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

42 ms

Accessibility Review

web-fx.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

web-fx.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

web-fx.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Web-fx.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Web-fx.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

web-fx.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Web FX. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: