3.5 sec in total
310 ms
2.8 sec
391 ms
Click here to check amazing WebEdition content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webedition.org
Mehr als nur ein Content Management System. Als ein Redaktionssystem. Als ein CMS. Bewährt seit 2001, frei skalierbar, volle Kontrolle, Erfolg garantiert.
Visit webedition.orgWe analyzed Webedition.org page load time and found that the first response time was 310 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
webedition.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value4.4 s
39/100
25%
Value4.7 s
68/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.092
92/100
15%
Value4.6 s
81/100
10%
310 ms
583 ms
485 ms
676 ms
763 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Webedition.org, 87% (45 requests) were made to Assets.webedition.org and 4% (2 requests) were made to Paypalobjects.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Assets.webedition.org.
Page size can be reduced by 44.9 kB (8%)
554.5 kB
509.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Webedition.org main page is 554.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 385.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. WebEdition images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 4.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webedition.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.6 kB or 12% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (84%)
49
8
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of WebEdition. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webedition.org
310 ms
www.webedition.org
583 ms
vendor.css
485 ms
bootstrap-custom.css
676 ms
styles.css
763 ms
sm.css
762 ms
md.css
765 ms
lg.css
765 ms
xl.css
765 ms
fonts.css
767 ms
font-awesome.css
854 ms
webedition-cms-logo.svg
943 ms
btn_donateCC_LG.gif
19 ms
jquery.js
952 ms
cookie.js
853 ms
bootstrap-3-3-5.js
854 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
857 ms
picturefill.js
944 ms
bootstrap-toolkit.js
946 ms
jquery-validate.js
951 ms
validation-additional-method.js
950 ms
jquery-validate-messages-de.js
1038 ms
jquery-visible.js
1037 ms
lazy.js
1039 ms
template.js
1042 ms
app.js
1045 ms
cookie-consent.css
1044 ms
pixel.gif
14 ms
shCore.css
653 ms
shCoreDefault.css
654 ms
shCoreDjango.css
655 ms
shCoreEclipse.css
658 ms
shCoreEmacs.css
662 ms
shCoreFadeToGrey.css
661 ms
shCoreMDUltra.css
745 ms
shCoreMidnight.css
745 ms
shCoreRDark.css
748 ms
shThemeDefault.css
750 ms
shThemeDjango.css
754 ms
shThemeEclipse.css
754 ms
shThemeEmacs.css
835 ms
shThemeFadeToGrey.css
639 ms
shThemeMDUltra.css
563 ms
shThemeMidnight.css
563 ms
shThemeRDark.css
567 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
567 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.css
648 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css
647 ms
weitblick.jpg
378 ms
4039_anwender-redakteure.jpg
467 ms
4040_entwickler-agenturen.jpg
466 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
188 ms
webedition.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
webedition.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
webedition.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webedition.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webedition.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webedition.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of WebEdition. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: