Tools & Wizards About Us
webeel.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

webeel.in

Web Design in Chennai| Development| Web Designers Company in Chennai

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

117 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

878 ms

webeel.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Web Eel content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webeel.in

Website designers and developers in chennai - Webeel is a top-rated chennai website design company providing solutions for corporate website development, digital marketing, mobile app development, eco...

Visit webeel.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Webeel.in page load time and found that the first response time was 117 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webeel.in performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

65/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,640 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.197

63/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.6 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webeel.in

117 ms

webeel.in

207 ms

bootstrap.min.css

136 ms

css

41 ms

css

59 ms

Our browser made a total of 158 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (144 requests) were addressed to the original Webeel.in, 2% (3 requests) were made to Collectcdn.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Checkout.razorpay.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 259.5 kB (6%)

Content Size

4.4 MB

After Optimization

4.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webeel.in main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 217.3 kB

  • Original 243.1 kB
  • After minification 210.2 kB
  • After compression 25.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 32.9 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 217.3 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 20.4 kB

  • Original 3.8 MB
  • After minification 3.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Eel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 17.6 kB

  • Original 268.5 kB
  • After minification 268.5 kB
  • After compression 250.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 64.3 kB
  • After minification 64.3 kB
  • After compression 60.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webeel.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (19%)

Requests Now

154

After Optimization

124

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 154 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Eel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webeel.in

webeel.in

117 ms

webeel.in

webeel.in

207 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

136 ms

css

css

41 ms

css

css

59 ms

icon-font.min.css

icon-font.min.css

126 ms

icofont.css

icofont.css

163 ms

meanmenu.min.css

meanmenu.min.css

132 ms

animate.css

animate.css

150 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

154 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

212 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

229 ms

style.css

style.css

260 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

243 ms

js

js

65 ms

payment-button.js

payment-button.js

1254 ms

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

364 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

295 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

364 ms

jquery.meanmenu.min.js

jquery.meanmenu.min.js

364 ms

jquery.sticky.js

jquery.sticky.js

364 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

365 ms

venobox.min.js

venobox.min.js

365 ms

jquery.mixitup.min.js

jquery.mixitup.min.js

423 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

442 ms

jquery.appear.js

jquery.appear.js

424 ms

jquery.inview.min.js

jquery.inview.min.js

424 ms

scrolltopcontrol.js

scrolltopcontrol.js

447 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

436 ms

form-contact.js

form-contact.js

496 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

498 ms

logo.png

logo.png

512 ms

1.png

1.png

511 ms

22.png

22.png

627 ms

20.png

20.png

627 ms

21.png

21.png

627 ms

23.png

23.png

626 ms

24.png

24.png

625 ms

25.png

25.png

627 ms

26.png

26.png

751 ms

27.png

27.png

709 ms

28.png

28.png

710 ms

29.png

29.png

752 ms

30.png

30.png

709 ms

31.png

31.png

707 ms

32.png

32.png

830 ms

33.png

33.png

817 ms

34.png

34.png

837 ms

35.png

35.png

828 ms

36.png

36.png

828 ms

37.png

37.png

844 ms

38.png

38.png

853 ms

39.png

39.png

876 ms

40.png

40.png

807 ms

41.png

41.png

857 ms

42.png

42.png

856 ms

43.png

43.png

873 ms

3.png

3.png

889 ms

font

font

22 ms

font

font

31 ms

Linearicons-Free.ttf

Linearicons-Free.ttf

396 ms

icofont7858.ttf

icofont7858.ttf

1150 ms

4.png

4.png

895 ms

2.png

2.png

896 ms

5.png

5.png

934 ms

6.png

6.png

902 ms

7.png

7.png

899 ms

8.png

8.png

960 ms

9.png

9.png

947 ms

launcher.js

launcher.js

384 ms

10.png

10.png

713 ms

11.png

11.png

752 ms

12.png

12.png

676 ms

13.png

13.png

781 ms

14.png

14.png

781 ms

15.png

15.png

781 ms

16.png

16.png

781 ms

17.png

17.png

782 ms

18.png

18.png

781 ms

19.png

19.png

721 ms

about-man.png

about-man.png

787 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

911 ms

6225aed2bc2315111d709335

6225aed2bc2315111d709335

164 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

864 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

902 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

846 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

845 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

941 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

1064 ms

8.jpg

8.jpg

1015 ms

17.jpg

17.jpg

1006 ms

10.jpg

10.jpg

1081 ms

11.jpg

11.jpg

1024 ms

details

details

251 ms

12.jpg

12.jpg

1118 ms

13.jpg

13.jpg

1113 ms

14.jpg

14.jpg

1151 ms

15.jpg

15.jpg

1158 ms

19.jpg

19.jpg

1086 ms

30.jpg

30.jpg

1033 ms

33.jpg

33.jpg

1133 ms

32.jpg

32.jpg

1103 ms

29.jpg

29.jpg

1110 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

1116 ms

27.jpg

27.jpg

1152 ms

21.jpg

21.jpg

1100 ms

waving_hand.gif

waving_hand.gif

26 ms

minified.js

minified.js

43 ms

widget.js

widget.js

89 ms

a3.png

a3.png

40 ms

31.jpg

31.jpg

1104 ms

28.jpg

28.jpg

1140 ms

26.jpg

26.jpg

1066 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

1089 ms

25.jpg

25.jpg

996 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

976 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

1017 ms

7.jpg

7.jpg

1051 ms

17.jpg

17.jpg

1067 ms

20.jpg

20.jpg

1077 ms

18.jpg

18.jpg

1070 ms

22.jpg

22.jpg

1105 ms

23.jpg

23.jpg

1052 ms

24.jpg

24.jpg

973 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

979 ms

34.jpg

34.jpg

985 ms

35.jpg

35.jpg

979 ms

36.jpg

36.jpg

1000 ms

37.jpg

37.jpg

902 ms

38.jpg

38.jpg

870 ms

39.jpg

39.jpg

876 ms

40.jpg

40.jpg

854 ms

41.jpg

41.jpg

841 ms

42.jpg

42.jpg

862 ms

43.jpg

43.jpg

795 ms

44.jpg

44.jpg

825 ms

45.jpg

45.jpg

772 ms

46.jpg

46.jpg

802 ms

47.jpg

47.jpg

783 ms

48.jpg

48.jpg

765 ms

49.jpg

49.jpg

786 ms

50.jpg

50.jpg

776 ms

51.jpg

51.jpg

809 ms

52.jpg

52.jpg

803 ms

53.jpg

53.jpg

775 ms

ajax-loader.gif

ajax-loader.gif

736 ms

tes6.jpg

tes6.jpg

796 ms

tes5.jpg

tes5.jpg

806 ms

tes2.jpg

tes2.jpg

734 ms

tes1.jpg

tes1.jpg

764 ms

tes3.jpg

tes3.jpg

745 ms

tes4.jpg

tes4.jpg

719 ms

slide3.jpg

slide3.jpg

871 ms

slide1.jpg

slide1.jpg

847 ms

slide2.jpg

slide2.jpg

851 ms

counter-bg.jpg

counter-bg.jpg

1046 ms

testimonial-bg.jpg

testimonial-bg.jpg

786 ms

bgimg.jpg

bgimg.jpg

712 ms

Accessibility Review

webeel.in accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

webeel.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

webeel.in SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    ZX

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webeel.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webeel.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webeel.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Web Eel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: