1.8 sec in total
78 ms
1.5 sec
192 ms
Visit webgoddess.net now to see the best up-to-date Web Goddess content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webgoddess.net
WordPress web design, ongoing maintenance, marketing, and hosting. Web consulting: good advice, reasonable prices. Personal service. You take care of your business, we'll take care of your websit...
Visit webgoddess.netWe analyzed Webgoddess.net page load time and found that the first response time was 78 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
webgoddess.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
40/100
10%
Value6.1 s
12/100
25%
Value4.4 s
73/100
10%
Value370 ms
71/100
30%
Value0.034
100/100
15%
Value7.6 s
47/100
10%
78 ms
12 ms
23 ms
21 ms
19 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Webgoddess.net, 21% (17 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (233 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 102.7 kB (14%)
753.3 kB
650.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Webgoddess.net main page is 753.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 334.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Goddess images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 32.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 18.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webgoddess.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.8 kB or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (80%)
60
12
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Goddess. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webgoddess.net
78 ms
portfolio.css
12 ms
style.min.css
23 ms
index.css
21 ms
index.css
19 ms
js_composer.min.css
28 ms
shortcodes.css
26 ms
style.css
50 ms
font-awesome.min.css
25 ms
responsive.css
45 ms
css
62 ms
css
74 ms
css
81 ms
jquery.min.js
48 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
48 ms
shortcodes.js
48 ms
v4-shims.min.css
46 ms
all.min.css
54 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
53 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
53 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
54 ms
autop.min.js
53 ms
blob.min.js
53 ms
block-serialization-default-parser.min.js
55 ms
react.min.js
54 ms
hooks.min.js
55 ms
deprecated.min.js
54 ms
dom.min.js
55 ms
react-dom.min.js
62 ms
escape-html.min.js
56 ms
element.min.js
56 ms
is-shallow-equal.min.js
55 ms
i18n.min.js
61 ms
keycodes.min.js
56 ms
priority-queue.min.js
58 ms
compose.min.js
61 ms
private-apis.min.js
59 ms
redux-routine.min.js
60 ms
data.min.js
61 ms
html-entities.min.js
61 ms
shortcode.min.js
58 ms
css
50 ms
blocks.min.js
53 ms
index.js
56 ms
plugins.js
51 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
50 ms
masonry.min.js
26 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
29 ms
smoothscroll.min.js
26 ms
main.js
24 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
27 ms
bg.jpg
152 ms
WebGoddessLogo_white-up.png
84 ms
jaime-300x140.png
87 ms
binocular.png
85 ms
jaime-150x150.png
85 ms
4C8BFFD4-15B8-4412-9B4A-5B48A26538F9-150x150.jpeg
85 ms
pinepoint-e1624043996701-150x150.jpg
86 ms
trygg-historical-maps-2020-1-150x150.jpg
87 ms
trailreadybumpers-150x150.jpg
88 ms
WWD2020-150x150.jpg
87 ms
wlp_gwjKBV1pqiv_1oYZ2Q.ttf
149 ms
wlpygwjKBV1pqhND-aQR82RHaA.ttf
178 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pYCPNLA3JRdf.ttf
40 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapYCPNLA3JRdf.ttf
55 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpYCPNLA3JRdf.ttf
56 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpYCPNLA3JRdf.ttf
63 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoooCPNLA3JRdf.ttf
76 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaooCPNLA3JRdf.ttf
62 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEooCPNLA3JRdf.ttf
96 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaooCPNLA3JRdf.ttf
125 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao4CPNLA3JRdf.ttf
98 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
17 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
16 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
17 ms
icomoon.woff
11 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vgUFoZAaQriI.ttf
96 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvgUFoZAaQriI.ttf
117 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvgUFoZAaQriI.ttf
94 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvgUFoZAaQriI.ttf
233 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9ogUFoZAaQriI.ttf
117 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZogUFoZAaQriI.ttf
101 ms
webgoddess.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
webgoddess.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
webgoddess.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webgoddess.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webgoddess.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webgoddess.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Web Goddess. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: