2.3 sec in total
92 ms
1.8 sec
467 ms
Click here to check amazing Webinarking content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webinarking.com
Visit webinarking.comWe analyzed Webinarking.com page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
webinarking.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value13.6 s
0/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value370 ms
70/100
30%
Value0.213
58/100
15%
Value7.4 s
49/100
10%
92 ms
593 ms
112 ms
39 ms
79 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Webinarking.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (593 ms) relates to the external source Thejimedwardsmethod.com.
Page size can be reduced by 530.3 kB (18%)
2.9 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Webinarking.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 55.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 473.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Webinarking needs image optimization as it can save up to 473.2 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 128 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webinarking.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (60%)
48
19
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webinarking. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thejimedwardsmethod.com
92 ms
thejimedwardsmethod.com
593 ms
js
112 ms
fbevents.js
39 ms
font-awesome.min.css
79 ms
dashicons.min.css
110 ms
frontend_form.css
132 ms
style.min.css
156 ms
style.css
136 ms
op_map.min.css
135 ms
style.min.css
131 ms
default.min.css
244 ms
opplus-front-all.min.css
157 ms
jquery.min.js
269 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
269 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
268 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
284 ms
hooks.min.js
291 ms
i18n.min.js
302 ms
jquery.tooltip-plugin.js
293 ms
jquery.tooltip.wlp.js
291 ms
op-jquery-base-all.min.js
300 ms
script.js
307 ms
op-front-all.min.js
313 ms
frontend.js
374 ms
core.min.js
374 ms
comment-reply.min.js
384 ms
accordion.min.js
430 ms
opplus-front-all.min.js
398 ms
menus.min.js
364 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
319 ms
js
47 ms
analytics.js
23 ms
collect
53 ms
tjemheader1060.png
163 ms
Copywriting-Secrets-248x300.jpg
127 ms
1.png
127 ms
box-web.jpg
34 ms
3hkbwsingle-944x1024.png
38 ms
isvs-box-small.png
40 ms
piw400.png
34 ms
destktop-ad-wizard-banner-b1.png
35 ms
EOWHeader4.png
34 ms
box-944x1024.png
36 ms
eiwbigbox-944x1024.png
37 ms
Custom_Content_Wizard-Banner-Final-1.png
39 ms
trifecta1.png
40 ms
MasterSiteBanner.png
38 ms
CC-Upgrade-BookChallenge-Yearly-300-2-copy.webp
156 ms
arrow.png
157 ms
box-web.jpg
150 ms
EOWHeader4.png
167 ms
piw400.png
178 ms
destktop-ad-wizard-banner-b1.png
197 ms
box-944x1024.png
465 ms
eiwbigbox-944x1024.png
387 ms
3hkbwsingle-944x1024.png
232 ms
Custom_Content_Wizard-Banner-Final-1.png
248 ms
isvs-box-small.png
261 ms
MasterSiteBanner.png
279 ms
trifecta1.png
318 ms
wARDj0u
6 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
17 ms
webinarking.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
[role]s do not have all required [aria-*] attributes
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
webinarking.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
webinarking.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webinarking.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webinarking.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webinarking.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webinarking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: