2.4 sec in total
181 ms
1.5 sec
717 ms
Visit webmailportal.com now to see the best up-to-date Web Mail Portal content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webmailportal.com
webmailportal.com | Ad-Free & Secure Email • Unlimited Mailbox Storage • Easy-to-Use Interface • Access via Webmail & Your Favorite Email App • Stay Organized and On Schedule with MeMail. Great for:
Visit webmailportal.comWe analyzed Webmailportal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 181 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
webmailportal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value14.3 s
0/100
10%
Value19.6 s
0/100
25%
Value28.3 s
0/100
10%
Value21,020 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.11
87/100
15%
Value55.2 s
0/100
10%
181 ms
57 ms
211 ms
25 ms
5 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 16% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Webmailportal.com, 10% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (679 ms) relates to the external source Affiliate.flipkart.com.
Page size can be reduced by 281.7 kB (49%)
580.5 kB
298.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Webmailportal.com main page is 580.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 393.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 827 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Mail Portal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 213.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 213.8 kB or 54% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webmailportal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 42.9 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (54%)
46
21
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Mail Portal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webmailportal.com
181 ms
autoptimize_70c1686d9f1519649f36d1a5d50873fd.css
57 ms
autoptimize_d2897f4d2f9c3dc3582fd0d8b1cce73e.css
211 ms
css
25 ms
adsbygoogle.js
5 ms
FKAffiliateWidgets.js
588 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
4 ms
gprofiles.js
54 ms
e-201611.js
4 ms
autoptimize_35778b219020e01ec71bd88e3a3a8174.js
286 ms
analytics.js
118 ms
bodytile.jpg
176 ms
logo.png
90 ms
woothemes.png
89 ms
ca-pub-8307138656716902.js
121 ms
zrt_lookup.html
115 ms
show_ads_impl.js
116 ms
5t8vP9Hx2udzw372glmOxA.ttf
71 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
143 ms
widgets.js
46 ms
hovercard.css
69 ms
services.css
118 ms
g.gif
26 ms
collect
16 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
172 ms
ads
340 ms
osd.js
114 ms
ads
345 ms
syndication
103 ms
663440566496063488
209 ms
displayWidget
679 ms
FKFECollector.js
295 ms
m_js_controller.js
31 ms
abg.js
50 ms
proxy.jpg
44 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
5 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
8 ms
favicon
76 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
100 ms
nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png
46 ms
b5oBmiwR_normal.jpg
68 ms
CWIwVRMWcAAqobg.jpg:small
164 ms
s
33 ms
x_button_blue2.png
28 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
67 ms
syndication_bundle_v1_64fcb3dd2f6da5b5f976d91a319ef73e329c1a5d.css
71 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
12 ms
proxy.jpg
6 ms
20130916-125959-size-1-foz-all-offer.jpg
32 ms
webmailportal.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
webmailportal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
webmailportal.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webmailportal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Webmailportal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webmailportal.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Web Mail Portal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: