11.4 sec in total
2.6 sec
8.2 sec
667 ms
Click here to check amazing Webmat content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webmat.pro
Mathieu, développeur Freelance spécialisé sur le CMS WordPress depuis 2013. Service et compréhension de vos demandes. Rapidité d’exécution de votre projet.
Visit webmat.proWe analyzed Webmat.pro page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 8.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
webmat.pro performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.8 s
0/100
10%
Value11.0 s
0/100
25%
Value20.1 s
0/100
10%
Value11,130 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value20.8 s
2/100
10%
2570 ms
160 ms
257 ms
264 ms
375 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Webmat.pro, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Webmat.pro.
Page size can be reduced by 152.5 kB (29%)
533.3 kB
380.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Webmat.pro main page is 533.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 214.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 90.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 642 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webmat images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 17.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 17.7 kB or 20% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webmat.pro needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 43.8 kB or 20% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (77%)
61
14
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webmat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webmat.pro
2570 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
160 ms
style.min.css
257 ms
wc-blocks-vendors-style.css
264 ms
wc-blocks-style.css
375 ms
formcraft-common.css
302 ms
form.css
289 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
321 ms
woocommerce.css
351 ms
cookieblocker.min.css
356 ms
style.css
386 ms
custom.css
392 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
422 ms
frontend.min.css
449 ms
post-10726.css
458 ms
frontend.min.css
565 ms
all.min.css
479 ms
v4-shims.min.css
490 ms
global.css
521 ms
post-5.css
542 ms
post-10520.css
548 ms
client-area.css
587 ms
css
32 ms
fontawesome.min.css
588 ms
solid.min.css
619 ms
jquery.min.js
640 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
652 ms
v4-shims.min.js
659 ms
js
50 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
728 ms
js.cookie.min.js
728 ms
woocommerce.min.js
728 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
728 ms
complianz.min.js
729 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
729 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
729 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
729 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
762 ms
js
15 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
816 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
722 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
643 ms
hooks.min.js
649 ms
i18n.min.js
618 ms
frontend.min.js
653 ms
waypoints.min.js
666 ms
core.min.js
614 ms
frontend.min.js
642 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
625 ms
home-banner-bg.png
358 ms
header-img.png
553 ms
me_desktop.png
374 ms
convers-large-768x461.png
397 ms
video-bg-shape.png
400 ms
wordpress-logo-300x68.png
411 ms
o2switch-logo-300x81.png
451 ms
elementor-logo-300x83.png
465 ms
trello-logo-300x92.png
496 ms
litespeed-logo-300x75.png
510 ms
laragon-300x120.png
678 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
34 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
50 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
89 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
121 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
122 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
122 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
667 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
488 ms
eicons.woff
706 ms
webmat.pro
1579 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
95 ms
webmat.pro accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
webmat.pro best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
webmat.pro SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webmat.pro can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webmat.pro main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webmat.pro
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Webmat. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: