Tools & Wizards About Us
webpartner.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    45% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    61% of websites

webpartner.in

SEO, Web Design and Internet Marketing Company in New Delhi, India

Page Load Speed

7.7 sec in total

First Response

520 ms

Resources Loaded

6.5 sec

Page Rendered

698 ms

webpartner.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Web Partner content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webpartner.in

As an India’s leading Digital marketing company, we provide ecommerce marketing, SEM, PPC, social media and SEO services at Lowest price GUARANTEED!

Visit webpartner.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Webpartner.in page load time and found that the first response time was 520 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webpartner.in performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.5 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value970 ms

28/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.1 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webpartner.in

520 ms

webpartner.in

1510 ms

animate.css

1978 ms

owl.carousel.css

1121 ms

font-awesome.min.css

150 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Webpartner.in, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Webpartner.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 571.5 kB (32%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webpartner.in main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 70.5 kB

  • Original 79.6 kB
  • After minification 52.2 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27.5 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web Partner images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 138.8 kB

  • Original 215.8 kB
  • After minification 208.6 kB
  • After compression 77.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 138.8 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 362.3 kB

  • Original 392.9 kB
  • After minification 333.5 kB
  • After compression 30.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webpartner.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 362.3 kB or 92% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (33%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

45

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web Partner. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webpartner.in

webpartner.in

520 ms

webpartner.in

webpartner.in

1510 ms

animate.css

animate.css

1978 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

1121 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

150 ms

bootsnav.css

bootsnav.css

1351 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1850 ms

style.css

style.css

1614 ms

aos.css

aos.css

1436 ms

css2

css2

158 ms

css2

css2

171 ms

css2

css2

180 ms

js

js

188 ms

js

js

262 ms

payment-button.js

payment-button.js

824 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1360 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1113 ms

bootsnav.js

bootsnav.js

1217 ms

aos.js

aos.js

1359 ms

owl-carousel.2.3.0.min.js

owl-carousel.2.3.0.min.js

1375 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

227 ms

js

js

209 ms

pattern_arrow2.png

pattern_arrow2.png

674 ms

counter.php

counter.php

667 ms

logo2.jpg

logo2.jpg

673 ms

what.png

what.png

672 ms

Call.png

Call.png

672 ms

hero-img1.png

hero-img1.png

671 ms

web1.jpg

web1.jpg

673 ms

web2.jpg

web2.jpg

672 ms

web5.jpg

web5.jpg

1514 ms

web3.jpg

web3.jpg

1485 ms

web4.jpg

web4.jpg

1486 ms

web6.jpg

web6.jpg

1484 ms

waves.png

waves.png

1485 ms

waves2.png

waves2.png

1485 ms

circle-triangle.png

circle-triangle.png

1708 ms

plus-big.png

plus-big.png

1708 ms

plus-small.png

plus-small.png

1709 ms

circle-big.png

circle-big.png

1707 ms

shape-circle.png

shape-circle.png

1716 ms

shape-tall.png

shape-tall.png

1707 ms

dots-colour.png

dots-colour.png

1928 ms

new-img.png

new-img.png

1925 ms

work1.png

work1.png

1926 ms

work2.png

work2.png

1929 ms

work3.png

work3.png

1922 ms

work4.png

work4.png

1953 ms

work5.png

work5.png

2153 ms

tradebossimpex.jpg

tradebossimpex.jpg

2619 ms

premiercotspin.jpg

premiercotspin.jpg

2624 ms

napasartimes.jpg

napasartimes.jpg

2643 ms

indiabhutantour.jpg

indiabhutantour.jpg

2610 ms

bharatchains.jpg

bharatchains.jpg

2680 ms

andmanfamilytour.jpg

andmanfamilytour.jpg

2592 ms

img-11.jpg

img-11.jpg

2825 ms

pattern_arrow1.png

pattern_arrow1.png

1454 ms

pattern_arrow3.png

pattern_arrow3.png

1456 ms

SEO_539x399.png

SEO_539x399.png

1879 ms

Video_Marketing_539x399.png

Video_Marketing_539x399.png

1679 ms

Content_Marketing_539x399.png

Content_Marketing_539x399.png

1895 ms

Digital_Marketing_539x399.png

Digital_Marketing_539x399.png

1678 ms

web_development_539x399.png

web_development_539x399.png

1645 ms

web_design_539x399.png

web_design_539x399.png

2071 ms

plus-big.png

plus-big.png

1869 ms

cta_bg.png

cta_bg.png

1902 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1tvEv-L.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1tvEv-L.ttf

354 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

349 ms

jubstron-bg.png

jubstron-bg.png

2550 ms

collect

collect

208 ms

collect

collect

175 ms

collect

collect

727 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

71 ms

Accessibility Review

webpartner.in accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

webpartner.in best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

webpartner.in SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webpartner.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webpartner.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webpartner.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Web Partner. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: