3.1 sec in total
600 ms
2.2 sec
278 ms
Welcome to webpublication.us homepage info - get ready to check Webpublication best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about webpublication.us
Wepublication digital publishing solution helps designers effortlessly create interactive digital publications, like magazines, brochures, reports, catalogues, and more.
Visit webpublication.usWe analyzed Webpublication.us page load time and found that the first response time was 600 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
webpublication.us performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value14.8 s
0/100
25%
Value19.9 s
0/100
10%
Value20,890 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.07
96/100
15%
Value33.4 s
0/100
10%
600 ms
237 ms
66 ms
477 ms
397 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Webpublication.us, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (746 ms) belongs to the original domain Webpublication.us.
Page size can be reduced by 419.1 kB (36%)
1.2 MB
758.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Webpublication.us main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 780.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.0 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 132.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Webpublication needs image optimization as it can save up to 132.6 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 158.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 158.8 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 80.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webpublication.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 80.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (48%)
79
41
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webpublication. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webpublication.us
600 ms
style.css
237 ms
css
66 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
477 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
397 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
239 ms
cycle3_script.js
161 ms
script.js
256 ms
html5placeholder.jquery.js
242 ms
jquery.selectbox-0.1.3.min.js
315 ms
template.css
318 ms
waveblue.css
322 ms
custom.css
425 ms
mootools.js
632 ms
caption.js
396 ms
base.js
400 ms
accordionmenu.js
495 ms
fancymenu.js
495 ms
dropdownmenu.js
495 ms
template.js
510 ms
swfobject.js
550 ms
script_wp.js
550 ms
reset.css
83 ms
layout.css
82 ms
typography.css
109 ms
menus.css
141 ms
modules.css
143 ms
joomla.css
239 ms
extensions.css
160 ms
wp_lp_v3.css
194 ms
wp_mobile.css
219 ms
wp_actualite.css
221 ms
ga.js
50 ms
page_bg.png
88 ms
choose_language_usa.png
89 ms
nb.jpg
317 ms
iphone-big.jpg
399 ms
girl-tablet.jpg
238 ms
tablet-big.jpg
319 ms
white-tablet.jpg
241 ms
mitie.jpg
343 ms
tech.png
396 ms
all.js
42 ms
cycle3_params.php
290 ms
logo.png
353 ms
menubar_bg.png
357 ms
home.jpg
359 ms
submenu_arrow.png
386 ms
menu_level2_group_b.png
432 ms
menu_level3_item.png
432 ms
blue-button-l.png
433 ms
blue-button-r.png
434 ms
dark-button-l.png
437 ms
dark-button-r.png
471 ms
bg1.png
511 ms
eco.jpg
511 ms
module_rounded_white_corners.png
512 ms
lcd.png
514 ms
lcd2.png
516 ms
html5.png
556 ms
tab.jpg
668 ms
iphone.jpg
667 ms
smart.jpg
669 ms
footer_anchor.png
593 ms
etihad.png
596 ms
vdf.png
642 ms
loreal.png
673 ms
visa.png
675 ms
publicis.png
728 ms
orange.png
746 ms
__utm.gif
17 ms
tfl.png
707 ms
123 ms
vinci.png
705 ms
xd_arbiter.php
20 ms
xd_arbiter.php
23 ms
black.png
562 ms
ogi.png
561 ms
as.png
545 ms
slider-bullet.png
536 ms
webpublication.us accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
webpublication.us best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
webpublication.us SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webpublication.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Webpublication.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webpublication.us
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webpublication. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: