Tools & Wizards About Us
websitedefender.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

websitedefender.com

Ovo Slot : Situs Judi Mpo Slot Deposit Dana Ovo 5000 Terbaik Indonesia 2023

Page Load Speed

806 ms in total

First Response

17 ms

Resources Loaded

633 ms

Page Rendered

156 ms

websitedefender.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Websitedefender content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about websitedefender.com

Slot ovo situs Judi mpo slot deposit Dana ovo 5000 Terbaik No 1 Indonesia kini semakin banyak penggemarnya di Indonesia dengan menngunakan link login mpo slot deposit ovo 5000. dengan proses deposit t...

Visit websitedefender.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Websitedefender.com page load time and found that the first response time was 17 ms and then it took 789 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

websitedefender.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.3 s

42/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,160 ms

22/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.8 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

websitedefender.com

17 ms

www.acunetix.com

161 ms

fbevents.js

45 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

24 ms

docembdr.css

6 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Websitedefender.com, 35% (18 requests) were made to D3eaqdewfg2crq.cloudfront.net and 27% (14 requests) were made to Acunetix.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (334 ms) relates to the external source Facebook.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 556.8 kB (41%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

804.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Websitedefender.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 581.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 76.2 kB

  • Original 103.1 kB
  • After minification 100.0 kB
  • After compression 26.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76.2 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 542.4 kB
  • After minification 534.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Websitedefender images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 361.4 kB

  • Original 581.0 kB
  • After minification 578.4 kB
  • After compression 219.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 361.4 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 110.8 kB

  • Original 134.8 kB
  • After minification 133.4 kB
  • After compression 24.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Websitedefender.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 110.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (46%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Websitedefender. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

websitedefender.com

websitedefender.com

17 ms

www.acunetix.com

www.acunetix.com

161 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

45 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

24 ms

docembdr.css

docembdr.css

6 ms

style.css

style.css

16 ms

css

css

29 ms

api.js

api.js

40 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

15 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

22 ms

acxfortgateh2359x300_hype_generated_script.js

acxfortgateh2359x300_hype_generated_script.js

23 ms

acxacusensortech_hype_generated_script.js

acxacusensortech_hype_generated_script.js

22 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

31 ms

base-js-combined.min.js

base-js-combined.min.js

26 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

13 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

22 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

25 ms

cryptojs-sha256.js

cryptojs-sha256.js

25 ms

acx-form-ovs-signup.js

acx-form-ovs-signup.js

27 ms

ga.js

ga.js

220 ms

334 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

272 ms

background.jpg

background.jpg

246 ms

HYPE.js

HYPE.js

208 ms

HYPE.js

HYPE.js

207 ms

crawl-scan.svg

crawl-scan.svg

198 ms

298 ms

cse.js

cse.js

232 ms

threat-level.png

threat-level.png

70 ms

report.png

report.png

99 ms

acunetix-logo.png

acunetix-logo.png

69 ms

detect-alert.svg

detect-alert.svg

32 ms

report-remediate.svg

report-remediate.svg

31 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

69 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

94 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

111 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

97 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

30 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

118 ms

Gate-Shadow.png

Gate-Shadow.png

32 ms

Shadow-1.png

Shadow-1.png

32 ms

Gate-Opening-Wall.png

Gate-Opening-Wall.png

59 ms

GateS.png

GateS.png

31 ms

Gate-WHIPEOUT2.png

Gate-WHIPEOUT2.png

32 ms

acx-icon.png

acx-icon.png

45 ms

glow-1.png

glow-1.png

56 ms

logos_n_icons-blkbox_scanning_net_n_php.png

logos_n_icons-blkbox_scanning_net_n_php.png

45 ms

cse.js

cse.js

116 ms

18 ms

collect

collect

54 ms

jsapi

jsapi

20 ms

Accessibility Review

websitedefender.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

websitedefender.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

websitedefender.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ID

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Websitedefender.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Websitedefender.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

websitedefender.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Websitedefender. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: