727 ms in total
68 ms
499 ms
160 ms
Visit websitedesigner.com now to see the best up-to-date Website Designer content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about websitedesigner.com
Based in Rhode Island, we're a website design, hosting & digital marketing company. Want options? We got 'em.
Visit websitedesigner.comWe analyzed Websitedesigner.com page load time and found that the first response time was 68 ms and then it took 659 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
websitedesigner.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.1 s
3/100
10%
Value11.7 s
0/100
25%
Value6.1 s
45/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.3 s
49/100
10%
68 ms
56 ms
5 ms
19 ms
17 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Websitedesigner.com, 32% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (149 ms) relates to the external source Bat.bing.com.
Page size can be reduced by 192.0 kB (46%)
421.2 kB
229.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Websitedesigner.com main page is 421.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 239.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 5.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 520 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Website Designer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 120.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 120.5 kB or 50% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 65.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Websitedesigner.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 65.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (63%)
16
6
The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Website Designer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
websitedesigner.com
68 ms
www.websitedesigner.com
56 ms
normalize.css
5 ms
webflow.css
19 ms
websitedesigner.webflow.css
17 ms
webfont.js
47 ms
modernizr.js
18 ms
jquery.min.js
79 ms
webflow.js
25 ms
conversion.js
34 ms
css
49 ms
prum.min.js
87 ms
home-hero-dt.jpg
67 ms
82 ms
analytics.js
87 ms
bat.js
149 ms
logo.png
14 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
62 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
70 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
89 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
108 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hnhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
106 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxh_xHqYgAV9Bl_ZQbYUxnQU.woff
111 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBobN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff
106 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxn5HxGBcBvicCpTp6spHfNo.woff
98 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxjqR_3kx9_hJXbbyU8S6IN0.woff
106 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxkCDe67GEgBv_HnyvHTfdew.woff
110 ms
76 ms
collect
32 ms
collect
48 ms
ga-audiences
27 ms
websitedesigner.com accessibility score
websitedesigner.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
websitedesigner.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Websitedesigner.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Websitedesigner.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
websitedesigner.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Website Designer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: