Tools & Wizards About Us
websiteupgradetester.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

websiteupgradetester.com

WebsiteUpgradeTester.com, the fast and easy tool to test your website upgrade

Page Load Speed

817 ms in total

First Response

11 ms

Resources Loaded

270 ms

Page Rendered

536 ms

websiteupgradetester.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to websiteupgradetester.com homepage info - get ready to check Website Upgrade Tester best content right away, or after learning these important things about websiteupgradetester.com

Don't waste time manually testing your next Website upgrade or patch. Instead quickly compare all pages pre/post upgrade digitally with 100% accuracy. By upgrading faster and more often you can take a...

Visit websiteupgradetester.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Websiteupgradetester.com page load time and found that the first response time was 11 ms and then it took 806 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

websiteupgradetester.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

64/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,530 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.3 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

websiteupgradetester.com

11 ms

websiteupgradetester.com

23 ms

www.websiteupgradetester.com

57 ms

gtm.js

145 ms

bootstrap.min.css

10 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Websiteupgradetester.com, 4% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Platform-api.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (145 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 68.6 kB (23%)

Content Size

292.1 kB

After Optimization

223.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Websiteupgradetester.com main page is 292.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 112.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 52.0 kB

  • Original 67.7 kB
  • After minification 67.4 kB
  • After compression 15.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 8.0 kB

  • Original 81.2 kB
  • After minification 73.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Website Upgrade Tester images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 112.8 kB
  • After minification 112.8 kB
  • After compression 105.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 30.4 kB
  • After minification 30.4 kB
  • After compression 28.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Websiteupgradetester.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (79%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Website Upgrade Tester. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

websiteupgradetester.com

websiteupgradetester.com

11 ms

websiteupgradetester.com

websiteupgradetester.com

23 ms

www.websiteupgradetester.com

www.websiteupgradetester.com

57 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

145 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

10 ms

style.css

style.css

22 ms

winning_stan.png

winning_stan.png

78 ms

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

jquery-3.3.1.min.js

52 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

50 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

63 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

48 ms

ea.js

ea.js

48 ms

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

jquery.nicescroll.min.js

77 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

75 ms

classie.js

classie.js

74 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.js

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.js

124 ms

script.js

script.js

75 ms

cbpAnimatedHeader.js

cbpAnimatedHeader.js

127 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

127 ms

common.js

common.js

124 ms

videos.js

videos.js

126 ms

login.js

login.js

126 ms

documentation.js

documentation.js

132 ms

bootstrap-tabcollapse.js

bootstrap-tabcollapse.js

134 ms

sharethis.js

sharethis.js

126 ms

homepage.js

homepage.js

127 ms

empty.png

empty.png

94 ms

Accessibility Review

websiteupgradetester.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

websiteupgradetester.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

websiteupgradetester.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Websiteupgradetester.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Websiteupgradetester.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

websiteupgradetester.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Website Upgrade Tester. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: