2.9 sec in total
384 ms
2.3 sec
242 ms
Click here to check amazing Websiteworth content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about websiteworth.uk
Get complete Website Stats, Traffic Stats, Search Engines Index Stats, Website Safety Stats, SEO Stats, Social Media Stats, Domain Info & Web Server Info
Visit websiteworth.ukWe analyzed Websiteworth.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 384 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
websiteworth.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.1 s
100/100
10%
Value1.1 s
100/100
25%
Value1.1 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.1 s
100/100
10%
384 ms
370 ms
385 ms
399 ms
15 ms
Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Websiteworth.uk, 32% (20 requests) were made to Google.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 291.0 kB (50%)
585.6 kB
294.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Websiteworth.uk main page is 585.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 194.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Websiteworth images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 88.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 88.7 kB or 46% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 151.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Websiteworth.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 151.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (70%)
54
16
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Websiteworth. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
websiteworth.uk
384 ms
bootstrap.min.css
370 ms
font-awesome.min.css
385 ms
style.css
399 ms
adsbygoogle.js
15 ms
echo.min.js
381 ms
jquery.1.9.1.min.js
400 ms
bootstrap.min.js
381 ms
jquery-cookie.js
466 ms
ajaxQ.js
466 ms
javascript.php
535 ms
css
25 ms
sdk.js
206 ms
favicons
463 ms
background.jpg
264 ms
logo.png
111 ms
captcha.php
318 ms
large_logo.png
110 ms
favicons
606 ms
favicons
120 ms
favicons
190 ms
favicons
366 ms
favicons
604 ms
favicons
345 ms
favicons
387 ms
favicons
1295 ms
favicons
1087 ms
favicons
428 ms
favicons
431 ms
favicons
457 ms
favicons
1159 ms
favicons
569 ms
favicons
1428 ms
favicons
764 ms
favicons
617 ms
favicons
677 ms
favicons
767 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
34 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
34 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
35 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
34 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
35 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
232 ms
ca-pub-3986116917013785.js
79 ms
zrt_lookup.html
70 ms
show_ads_impl.js
70 ms
ads
250 ms
osd.js
69 ms
ads
272 ms
84 ms
ads
265 ms
xd_arbiter.php
169 ms
xd_arbiter.php
357 ms
m_js_controller.js
39 ms
abg.js
91 ms
favicon
142 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
140 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
113 ms
s
81 ms
x_button_blue2.png
79 ms
favicon
90 ms
favicon
86 ms
7-1I540iwtLQZRDhQUP9L-vt70m6ZeYTcveWqB03r34.js
32 ms
websiteworth.uk accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
websiteworth.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
websiteworth.uk SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Websiteworth.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Websiteworth.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
websiteworth.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Websiteworth. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: