2 sec in total
75 ms
1.5 sec
432 ms
Click here to check amazing Websurfmedia content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about websurfmedia.com
fresh CSS frameworks to consider in 2016 that helps writing clean CSS and accomplishing projects following ‘on-time’ strategy.
Visit websurfmedia.comWe analyzed Websurfmedia.com page load time and found that the first response time was 75 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
websurfmedia.com performance score
75 ms
958 ms
43 ms
66 ms
73 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Websurfmedia.com, 14% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (958 ms) belongs to the original domain Websurfmedia.com.
Page size can be reduced by 268.1 kB (21%)
1.2 MB
979.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Websurfmedia.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 950.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.5 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 62.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Websurfmedia images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 96.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 96.9 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 69.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Websurfmedia.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 69.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (49%)
41
21
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Websurfmedia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
websurfmedia.com
75 ms
www.websurfmedia.com
958 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
43 ms
public.min.css
66 ms
font-awesome.min.css
73 ms
style.css
75 ms
responsive.css
69 ms
jquery.js
100 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
84 ms
customscript.js
119 ms
css
23 ms
css
37 ms
css
48 ms
css
49 ms
public.min.js
132 ms
whatsapp-share.min.js
132 ms
wp-embed.min.js
133 ms
logo.png
364 ms
facebook.png
375 ms
twitter.png
374 ms
css3-frameworks-460x400.jpg
379 ms
wordpress-web-design-banner-460x300.jpg
377 ms
FeaturedImage-460x400.png
385 ms
Capture-460x350.png
382 ms
design-460x400.png
394 ms
ESL-%E2%80%93-lacrosse-training-facility-460x369.jpg
380 ms
Avada-58-460x372.jpg
383 ms
18.-Zero-Landfill-460x360.jpg
386 ms
12.-The-Carpenter-79.00-460x340.jpg
391 ms
wolpeper-promo-460x400.jpg
393 ms
money-100-1000x5001-65x50.jpg
386 ms
magento4-65x50.png
388 ms
wolpeper-promo-65x50.jpg
392 ms
plutonHTML5-65x50.jpg
394 ms
Avada-58-65x50.jpg
394 ms
444-65x50.png
395 ms
300x250.png
395 ms
nobg.png
321 ms
analytics.js
254 ms
rainbow.png
271 ms
dropdowm_up.png
270 ms
2OObVMTQarlIKJSvYmLF5w.ttf
53 ms
Vj6JEk1YZr8j8R8H2j0b-qCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
53 ms
MViwy4K6e56oHcyeMzjbCQ.ttf
55 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
56 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
54 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
55 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
54 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
53 ms
collect
22 ms
websurfmedia.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Websurfmedia.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Websurfmedia.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
websurfmedia.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Websurfmedia. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: