3.1 sec in total
534 ms
2.4 sec
200 ms
Click here to check amazing Web To Map content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about webtomap.com
On Web to Map you can post and discuss your local news, photos and videos. You can select content by tag and rating to find the stuff you like. All items posted on the map are easily shared on all maj...
Visit webtomap.comWe analyzed Webtomap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 534 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
webtomap.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.6 s
95/100
10%
Value13.3 s
0/100
25%
Value8.9 s
15/100
10%
Value2,310 ms
5/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value13.8 s
10/100
10%
534 ms
401 ms
162 ms
163 ms
164 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Webtomap.com, 48% (40 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 8% (7 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (872 ms) belongs to the original domain Webtomap.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (56%)
2.2 MB
972.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Webtomap.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 300.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 85.0 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 300.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Web To Map images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 818.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 818.3 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 95.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webtomap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 95.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (52%)
77
37
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web To Map. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
webtomap.com
534 ms
bootstrap.min.css
401 ms
anycluster.css
162 ms
jquery.rating.css
163 ms
chosen.css
164 ms
style.css
168 ms
logo-white.png
326 ms
js
96 ms
OpenLayers.js
872 ms
anycluster_marker.js
157 ms
anycluster.js
239 ms
django_ajax_csrf.js
167 ms
infobox_packed.js
237 ms
markerwithlabel_packed.js
250 ms
jquery.js
560 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
728 ms
jquery.MetaData.js
377 ms
jquery.rating.js
418 ms
bootstrap.min.js
393 ms
detectmobilebrowser.js
416 ms
map.js
472 ms
map-filters.js
502 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
585 ms
addthis_widget.js
31 ms
common.js
156 ms
util.js
248 ms
marker.js
248 ms
analytics.js
185 ms
layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js
79 ms
300lo.json
140 ms
chosen-sprite.png
164 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
152 ms
collect
93 ms
collect
106 ms
ga-audiences
35 ms
map.js
10 ms
onion.js
29 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
70 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
50 ms
stats.js
42 ms
controls.js
41 ms
infowindow.js
87 ms
transparent.png
32 ms
css
110 ms
vt
59 ms
vt
96 ms
vt
93 ms
google4.png
55 ms
vt
19 ms
vt
64 ms
vt
75 ms
vt
88 ms
vt
85 ms
vt
75 ms
vt
74 ms
vt
79 ms
vt
95 ms
vt
95 ms
vt
98 ms
vt
94 ms
vt
98 ms
vt
97 ms
vt
128 ms
vt
132 ms
vt
127 ms
vt
130 ms
vt
131 ms
vt
131 ms
vt
134 ms
vt
134 ms
vt
134 ms
vt
148 ms
vt
148 ms
vt
146 ms
vt
149 ms
mapcnt6.png
56 ms
tmapctrl.png
73 ms
tmapctrl4.png
70 ms
imgs8.png
93 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
59 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
67 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
91 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
92 ms
webtomap.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
webtomap.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
webtomap.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webtomap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Webtomap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
webtomap.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Web To Map. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: