Tools & Wizards About Us
webtoolkit.info screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 89% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

webtoolkit.info

webtoolkit.info - Code Snippets Repository

Page Load Speed

778 ms in total

First Response

68 ms

Resources Loaded

522 ms

Page Rendered

188 ms

webtoolkit.info screenshot

About Website

Visit webtoolkit.info now to see the best up-to-date Webtoolkit content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webtoolkit.info

a simple way to share code snippets and pastes with others.

Visit webtoolkit.info

Key Findings

We analyzed Webtoolkit.info page load time and found that the first response time was 68 ms and then it took 710 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webtoolkit.info performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

42/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value600 ms

49/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.105

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.9 s

35/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webtoolkit.info

68 ms

crayon.min_ver_2.6.5.css

20 ms

arduino_ide_copy_ver_2.6.5.css

36 ms

monaco_ver_2.6.5.css

41 ms

styles_ver_1.4.4.css

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Webtoolkit.info, 5% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (254 ms) relates to the external source Pagead2.googlesyndication.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 61.9 kB (15%)

Content Size

420.0 kB

After Optimization

358.2 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Webtoolkit.info main page is 420.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 357.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 17.7 kB

  • Original 22.8 kB
  • After minification 19.8 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.0 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.7 kB or 78% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 27.7 kB

  • Original 357.6 kB
  • After minification 357.3 kB
  • After compression 330.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 16.6 kB

  • Original 39.6 kB
  • After minification 39.6 kB
  • After compression 23.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webtoolkit.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 42% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (92%)

Requests Now

25

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webtoolkit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

webtoolkit.info

webtoolkit.info

68 ms

crayon.min_ver_2.6.5.css

crayon.min_ver_2.6.5.css

20 ms

arduino_ide_copy_ver_2.6.5.css

arduino_ide_copy_ver_2.6.5.css

36 ms

monaco_ver_2.6.5.css

monaco_ver_2.6.5.css

41 ms

styles_ver_1.4.4.css

styles_ver_1.4.4.css

38 ms

jquery.qtip.min_ver_2.0.1.css

jquery.qtip.min_ver_2.0.1.css

40 ms

default_ver_1.4.4.css

default_ver_1.4.4.css

40 ms

css

css

20 ms

genericons_ver_2.09.css

genericons_ver_2.09.css

39 ms

style_ver_2013_07_18.css

style_ver_2013_07_18.css

70 ms

jquery_ver_1.11.0.js

jquery_ver_1.11.0.js

84 ms

jquery_migrate.min_ver_1.2.1.js

jquery_migrate.min_ver_1.2.1.js

57 ms

crayon.min_ver_2.6.5.js

crayon.min_ver_2.6.5.js

57 ms

iphorm_ver_1.4.4.js

iphorm_ver_1.4.4.js

56 ms

swfupload_ver_2201_20110113.js

swfupload_ver_2201_20110113.js

58 ms

swfobject_ver_2.2_20120417.js

swfobject_ver_2.2_20120417.js

76 ms

swfupload.swfobject_ver_2201a.js

swfupload.swfobject_ver_2201a.js

77 ms

swfupload.queue_ver_2201.js

swfupload.queue_ver_2201.js

78 ms

module.admin.page.icons.min.css

module.admin.page.icons.min.css

79 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

100 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

100 ms

cufon-yui.js

cufon-yui.js

66 ms

harabara.cufonfonts.js

harabara.cufonfonts.js

101 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

107 ms

jquery.iphorm_ver_1.4.4.js

jquery.iphorm_ver_1.4.4.js

100 ms

jquery.form.min_ver_3.37.0.js

jquery.form.min_ver_3.37.0.js

101 ms

jquery.smooth_scroll.min_ver_1.4.9.js

jquery.smooth_scroll.min_ver_1.4.9.js

185 ms

jquery.qtip.min_ver_2.0.1.js

jquery.qtip.min_ver_2.0.1.js

186 ms

jquery.uniform.min_ver_2.1.0.js

jquery.uniform.min_ver_2.1.0.js

188 ms

jquery.infieldlabel.min_ver_0.1.js

jquery.infieldlabel.min_ver_0.1.js

189 ms

masonry.min_ver_3.1.2.js

masonry.min_ver_3.1.2.js

190 ms

jquery.masonry.min_ver_3.1.2.js

jquery.masonry.min_ver_3.1.2.js

189 ms

functions_ver_2013_07_18.js

functions_ver_2013_07_18.js

193 ms

noise.png

noise.png

128 ms

box-head1.png

box-head1.png

95 ms

ulbg_content.jpg

ulbg_content.jpg

96 ms

footerbg.jpg

footerbg.jpg

97 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

254 ms

Accessibility Review

webtoolkit.info accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

webtoolkit.info best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

webtoolkit.info SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webtoolkit.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Webtoolkit.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

webtoolkit.info

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: