Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

weightwatchers.net

WeightWatchers Weight-Loss Program—Lose Weight and Keep it Off | WW USA

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

95 ms

Resources Loaded

688 ms

Page Rendered

534 ms

weightwatchers.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to weightwatchers.net homepage info - get ready to check Weight Watchers best content right away, or after learning these important things about weightwatchers.net

Build healthy habits with a weight-loss program and nutritionist-designed food plan. Get support from expert coaches to help you lose weight and keep it off.

Visit weightwatchers.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Weightwatchers.net page load time and found that the first response time was 95 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

weightwatchers.net performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

64/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,450 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.069

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value31.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

weightwatchers.net

95 ms

123 ms

lux.js

153 ms

privacy.min.js

216 ms

main.00bd8710.js

157 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Weightwatchers.net, 47% (28 requests) were made to Weightwatchers.com and 30% (18 requests) were made to Cmx.weightwatchers.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (511 ms) relates to the external source Privacy-policy.truste.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (37%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Weightwatchers.net main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 169.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 89.1 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Weight Watchers images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

32

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Weight Watchers. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

weightwatchers.net accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

weightwatchers.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

weightwatchers.net SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Weightwatchers.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Weightwatchers.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Weight Watchers. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: