3.2 sec in total
922 ms
2 sec
256 ms
Welcome to wfgsaver.com homepage info - get ready to check Wfgsaver best content right away, or after learning these important things about wfgsaver.com
Business insurance, STORE INSURANCE,SERVICE INSURANCE
Visit wfgsaver.comWe analyzed Wfgsaver.com page load time and found that the first response time was 922 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
wfgsaver.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.0 s
100/100
10%
Value1.7 s
99/100
25%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.041
99/100
15%
Value1.1 s
100/100
10%
922 ms
499 ms
75 ms
76 ms
81 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Wfgsaver.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (922 ms) belongs to the original domain Wfgsaver.com.
Page size can be reduced by 698.0 kB (62%)
1.1 MB
422.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Wfgsaver.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 778.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 541 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wfgsaver images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 494.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 494.3 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 152.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wfgsaver.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 152.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (82%)
45
8
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wfgsaver. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wfgsaver.com
922 ms
typography2.php
499 ms
modal.css
75 ms
shadowbox_rounded.css
76 ms
style.css
81 ms
style.css
103 ms
darkblue.css
72 ms
style_responsive.css
140 ms
mootools-core.js
275 ms
core.js
202 ms
mootools-more.js
363 ms
modal.js
183 ms
jquery.min.js
305 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
241 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
274 ms
shadowbox.js
416 ms
HoverIntent.js
397 ms
script.js
396 ms
system.css
401 ms
general.css
495 ms
template.css
519 ms
template.responsive.css
460 ms
jquery.js
566 ms
script.js
503 ms
script.responsive.js
519 ms
element.js
34 ms
messages.css
488 ms
button.css
492 ms
system.css
35 ms
get_flash_player.gif
127 ms
header.jpg
176 ms
object227400126.png
122 ms
searchicon.png
124 ms
grad1-mask.png
122 ms
arrow3.png
123 ms
arrow.png
123 ms
blank.png
158 ms
fronttowns1.gif
404 ms
carrierLogos01.jpg
152 ms
translateelement.css
107 ms
main.js
110 ms
16a.png
114 ms
alt_flagsa.png
64 ms
carrierLogos03.jpg
113 ms
element_main.js
38 ms
translate_24dp.png
38 ms
l
44 ms
googlelogo_color_42x16dp.png
31 ms
wfgsaver.com accessibility score
wfgsaver.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
wfgsaver.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wfgsaver.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wfgsaver.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wfgsaver.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wfgsaver. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: