4.6 sec in total
752 ms
3.6 sec
297 ms
Welcome to wfp2.com homepage info - get ready to check Wfp 2 best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about wfp2.com
Ideen die verkaufen. Für Kommunikation, die euch und eure Marke erfolgreicher macht. Seit über 40 Jahren.
Visit wfp2.comWe analyzed Wfp2.com page load time and found that the first response time was 752 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
wfp2.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value3.7 s
58/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value110 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.042
99/100
15%
Value3.7 s
90/100
10%
752 ms
66 ms
319 ms
221 ms
302 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Wfp2.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Wfp2.com.
Page size can be reduced by 263.1 kB (41%)
639.8 kB
376.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Wfp2.com main page is 639.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 276.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.4 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.1 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wfp 2 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 136.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 136.7 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 113.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wfp2.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 113.7 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (59%)
37
15
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wfp 2. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.wfp2.com
752 ms
css
66 ms
wfp2.css
319 ms
stylesheet_d5a346f3fc.css
221 ms
ss-gizmo.css
302 ms
style.css
1352 ms
stylesheet_6a39f51a9f.css
337 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
226 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
530 ms
jquery.hammer.min.js
334 ms
gumby.js
426 ms
gumby.skiplink.js
428 ms
gumby.toggleswitch.js
432 ms
gumby.parallax.js
448 ms
gumby.init.js
517 ms
ss-gizmo.js
532 ms
bootstrap.transitions.js
536 ms
bootstrap.carousel.js
548 ms
wfp2.navigation.js
621 ms
wfp2.contextnavigation.js
636 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
642 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
641 ms
plugins.js
658 ms
main.js
720 ms
logo.png
151 ms
background.jpg
155 ms
background.jpg
279 ms
dpdmc_website.png
689 ms
digitaletreue.jpg
148 ms
digitaletreue.png
434 ms
SocialIcons.png
282 ms
typo3gold.png
290 ms
analytics.js
90 ms
QQt14e8dY39u-eYBZmppwZ_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
127 ms
da47ecd2-feea-403e-b247-9f8f5bb5157b.woff
219 ms
2ba6fbd5-9c17-4733-af15-f49fbecc5c15.woff
494 ms
9dc6c76b-0260-4292-af1d-0bc9eecbded2.woff
482 ms
ss-gizmo.woff
374 ms
collect
56 ms
wfp2.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
wfp2.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
wfp2.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wfp2.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Wfp2.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wfp2.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wfp 2. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: