Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

whatbird.com

Whatbird.com is under construction

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

526 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

233 ms

whatbird.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to whatbird.com homepage info - get ready to check Whatbird best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about whatbird.com

Identify birds in North America for bird watching or as a bird guide. Search engine for identifying birds. For birders and identification of wild birds.

Visit whatbird.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Whatbird.com page load time and found that the first response time was 526 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

whatbird.com performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

80/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.083

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

45/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

whatbird.com

526 ms

shared-styles.css

147 ms

WhatBird-styles.css

149 ms

VideoStreamer.js

293 ms

yq.js

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 39% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Whatbird.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Contextual.media.net and 6% (6 requests) were made to Qsearch.media.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Birdingtop500.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 659.6 kB (38%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Whatbird.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 770.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 48.2 kB

  • Original 57.9 kB
  • After minification 42.5 kB
  • After compression 9.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.5 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 52.6 kB

  • Original 770.6 kB
  • After minification 718.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Whatbird images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 448.6 kB

  • Original 767.6 kB
  • After minification 758.0 kB
  • After compression 319.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 448.6 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 110.2 kB

  • Original 129.5 kB
  • After minification 126.3 kB
  • After compression 19.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whatbird.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 110.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (70%)

Requests Now

99

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 99 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whatbird. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

whatbird.com accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

whatbird.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

whatbird.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whatbird.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whatbird.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Whatbird. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: