Tools & Wizards About Us
whichssl.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

whichssl.com

Comodo | Global Leader in Cyber Security Solutions

Page Load Speed

23.6 sec in total

First Response

276 ms

Resources Loaded

11.1 sec

Page Rendered

12.2 sec

whichssl.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Whichssl content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about whichssl.com

Comodo, the leading Cybersecurity Platform offers Free Antivirus, Internet Security, Endpoint Security and Website Security for Customers and Enterprise.

Visit whichssl.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Whichssl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 276 ms and then it took 23.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

whichssl.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

whichssl.com

276 ms

www.whichssl.com

1007 ms

css

251 ms

style.css

251 ms

home.css

409 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Whichssl.com, 12% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7 sec) relates to the external source Secure.comodo.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 442.5 kB (23%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Whichssl.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 26.1 kB

  • Original 35.4 kB
  • After minification 31.2 kB
  • After compression 9.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.2 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.1 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 36.5 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Whichssl images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 343.2 kB

  • Original 506.6 kB
  • After minification 468.7 kB
  • After compression 163.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 343.2 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 36.8 kB

  • Original 45.9 kB
  • After minification 38.9 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whichssl.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (33%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

28

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whichssl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

whichssl.com

whichssl.com

276 ms

www.whichssl.com

www.whichssl.com

1007 ms

css

css

251 ms

style.css

style.css

251 ms

home.css

home.css

409 ms

amcharts.js

amcharts.js

410 ms

serial.js

serial.js

1212 ms

jquery-latest.js

jquery-latest.js

1199 ms

thick_box.css

thick_box.css

1181 ms

thickbox.js

thickbox.js

2051 ms

responsiveslides.min.js

responsiveslides.min.js

2049 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

2020 ms

jquery.anyslider.js

jquery.anyslider.js

2019 ms

tracking.js

tracking.js

6964 ms

browserdetect.js

browserdetect.js

3184 ms

flashdetect.js

flashdetect.js

3184 ms

utm5.js

utm5.js

3183 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

6877 ms

top-bg.png

top-bg.png

2910 ms

logo.png

logo.png

2910 ms

soc.png

soc.png

2909 ms

home-banner-bg.png

home-banner-bg.png

2910 ms

menu-bg.png

menu-bg.png

2909 ms

more.png

more.png

2908 ms

survey-result-bg-new.png

survey-result-bg-new.png

3215 ms

ssl-survey-results.png

ssl-survey-results.png

3216 ms

com-line-sep.png

com-line-sep.png

3216 ms

ssl-reviews.png

ssl-reviews.png

3215 ms

comparison-of-ssl.png

comparison-of-ssl.png

3215 ms

ssl-tools.png

ssl-tools.png

3215 ms

which-ssl.jpg

which-ssl.jpg

5879 ms

whichSSL_slider.jpg

whichSSL_slider.jpg

3751 ms

ssl-certificate.jpg

ssl-certificate.jpg

5879 ms

compare-ssl.jpg

compare-ssl.jpg

5863 ms

web-security.jpg

web-security.jpg

5755 ms

qualys-ssl-labs-test-result.jpg

qualys-ssl-labs-test-result.jpg

5769 ms

icon3.png

icon3.png

6381 ms

icon4.png

icon4.png

6326 ms

star_full.png

star_full.png

6467 ms

star-third.png

star-third.png

6379 ms

star_empty.png

star_empty.png

6468 ms

icon2.png

icon2.png

6379 ms

ssl-news-icon.png

ssl-news-icon.png

6467 ms

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

3057 ms

mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIiZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIiZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

3103 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

3145 ms

QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf

QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf

3144 ms

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

3065 ms

Jzo62I39jc0gQRrbndN6nXYhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.ttf

Jzo62I39jc0gQRrbndN6nXYhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.ttf

3024 ms

loadingAnimation.gif

loadingAnimation.gif

767 ms

pixel.track2

pixel.track2

716 ms

SEO Factors

whichssl.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whichssl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whichssl.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

whichssl.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Whichssl. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: