Tools & Wizards About Us
whirlwind.energy screenshot

Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

whirlwind.energy

Home

Page Load Speed

7 sec in total

First Response

456 ms

Resources Loaded

5.6 sec

Page Rendered

901 ms

whirlwind.energy screenshot

About Website

Visit whirlwind.energy now to see the best up-to-date Whirlwind content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about whirlwind.energy

We offer future technologies for wind power

Visit whirlwind.energy

Key Findings

We analyzed Whirlwind.energy page load time and found that the first response time was 456 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

whirlwind.energy performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value18.3 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value29.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,620 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

whirlwind.energy

456 ms

whirlwind.energy

963 ms

js

152 ms

gtm.js

118 ms

legacy.css

180 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Whirlwind.energy, 4% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Whirlwind.energy.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (56%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Whirlwind.energy main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 924.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 102.4 kB

  • Original 126.9 kB
  • After minification 123.5 kB
  • After compression 24.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 102.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 86.0 kB

  • Original 583.2 kB
  • After minification 497.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Whirlwind needs image optimization as it can save up to 86.0 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 498.4 kB

  • Original 924.9 kB
  • After minification 900.4 kB
  • After compression 426.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 498.4 kB or 54% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 649.5 kB

  • Original 759.0 kB
  • After minification 632.9 kB
  • After compression 109.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whirlwind.energy needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 649.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 58 (78%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whirlwind. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

whirlwind.energy

whirlwind.energy

456 ms

whirlwind.energy

whirlwind.energy

963 ms

js

js

152 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

118 ms

legacy.css

legacy.css

180 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

580 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

fontawesome-all.min.css

552 ms

template.css

template.css

1105 ms

megamenu.css

megamenu.css

570 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

451 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

448 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

588 ms

stylesheet.css

stylesheet.css

593 ms

mediaboxck.css

mediaboxck.css

691 ms

style.css

style.css

718 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

729 ms

layout.css

layout.css

889 ms

animations.css

animations.css

894 ms

uploader.css

uploader.css

825 ms

bc443bb670525baf4c49e812ecc78645.css

bc443bb670525baf4c49e812ecc78645.css

877 ms

ourteam.css

ourteam.css

914 ms

tz_style.css

tz_style.css

964 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

1149 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

1174 ms

isotope.min.css

isotope.min.css

1058 ms

default.css

default.css

1116 ms

font.default.css

font.default.css

1124 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1465 ms

jquery-noconflict.js

jquery-noconflict.js

1286 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1311 ms

caption.js

caption.js

1318 ms

copylink.min.js

copylink.min.js

1343 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1384 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

1435 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

1459 ms

animate.min.js

animate.min.js

1483 ms

page.js

page.js

1491 ms

prettyPhoto.js

prettyPhoto.js

1542 ms

appear.js

appear.js

1590 ms

api.js

api.js

50 ms

js

js

105 ms

nav.js

nav.js

1620 ms

easing.min.js

easing.min.js

1464 ms

countTo.js

countTo.js

1204 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1268 ms

core.js

core.js

1182 ms

mediaboxck.min.js

mediaboxck.min.js

1166 ms

jquery.ui.core.min.js

jquery.ui.core.min.js

1217 ms

jquery.fileupload.min.js

jquery.fileupload.min.js

1232 ms

jquery.validate.min.js

jquery.validate.min.js

1236 ms

jquery.pwebcontact.min.js

jquery.pwebcontact.min.js

1177 ms

tz_portfolio_plus.min.js

tz_portfolio_plus.min.js

1168 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

1169 ms

resize.js

resize.js

1157 ms

timeline-min.js

timeline-min.js

1395 ms

keepalive.js

keepalive.js

1132 ms

bigvideo.js

bigvideo.js

1141 ms

video.js

video.js

1264 ms

css

css

31 ms

recaptcha__en_gb.js

recaptcha__en_gb.js

42 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

154 ms

loading-pink.gif

loading-pink.gif

630 ms

arrow-dn1.png

arrow-dn1.png

353 ms

LOGO-0.png

LOGO-0.png

629 ms

2.png

2.png

735 ms

5.png

5.png

736 ms

7.png

7.png

632 ms

model6-3-2-5-035.png

model6-3-2-5-035.png

632 ms

IMG_8797-2.jpg

IMG_8797-2.jpg

736 ms

270x290.gif

270x290.gif

774 ms

arrow-up1.png

arrow-up1.png

774 ms

5.png

5.png

731 ms

js

js

284 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

78 ms

OpenSans-Regular.ttf

OpenSans-Regular.ttf

680 ms

synthview_-_novecento_sans_wide_light-webfont.woff

synthview_-_novecento_sans_wide_light-webfont.woff

474 ms

Oswald-Light.ttf

Oswald-Light.ttf

582 ms

Raleway-Light.otf

Raleway-Light.otf

583 ms

icomoon.woff

icomoon.woff

860 ms

Raleway-Bold.otf

Raleway-Bold.otf

680 ms

Oswald-Regular.otf

Oswald-Regular.otf

679 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

680 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

770 ms

tl-icons.ttf

tl-icons.ttf

858 ms

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf

167 ms

BngSUXNadjH0qYEzV7ab-oWlsbg95AiFW_g.ttf

BngSUXNadjH0qYEzV7ab-oWlsbg95AiFW_g.ttf

235 ms

EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFWzro.ttf

EJRVQgYoZZY2vCFuvAFWzro.ttf

235 ms

collect

collect

181 ms

glyphicons-halflings-white.png

glyphicons-halflings-white.png

145 ms

Raleway-SemiBold.otf

Raleway-SemiBold.otf

294 ms

Raleway-ExtraLight.otf

Raleway-ExtraLight.otf

155 ms

Raleway-Medium.otf

Raleway-Medium.otf

154 ms

OpenSans-Bold.ttf

OpenSans-Bold.ttf

356 ms

Accessibility Review

whirlwind.energy accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

whirlwind.energy best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

whirlwind.energy SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whirlwind.energy can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whirlwind.energy main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

whirlwind.energy

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Whirlwind. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: