Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 53

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 22% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

Page Load Speed

6.4 sec in total

First Response

817 ms

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

313 ms

whiteat.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to whiteat.com homepage info - get ready to check Whiteat best content for South Korea right away, or after learning these important things about whiteat.com

Visit whiteat.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Whiteat.com page load time and found that the first response time was 817 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

whiteat.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.9 s

35/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

whiteat.com

817 ms

xe.min.css

199 ms

default.css

388 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

390 ms

default.css

386 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Whiteat.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Watclean7.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) relates to the external source Watclean7.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 447.3 kB (35%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

836.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Whiteat.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 751.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 37.5 kB

  • Original 45.8 kB
  • After minification 43.4 kB
  • After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 73.2 kB

  • Original 751.8 kB
  • After minification 678.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Whiteat images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 295.5 kB

  • Original 431.9 kB
  • After minification 419.3 kB
  • After compression 136.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 295.5 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 41.1 kB

  • Original 53.8 kB
  • After minification 50.4 kB
  • After compression 12.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whiteat.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 41.1 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (52%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whiteat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

whiteat.com accessibility score

53

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

whiteat.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

whiteat.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    KO

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whiteat.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Korean. Our system also found out that Whiteat.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Whiteat. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: