Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

whiteelephant.com

White Elephant Resorts | Landmark Nantucket and Palm Beach Hotels

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

116 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

756 ms

whiteelephant.com screenshot

About Website

Visit whiteelephant.com now to see the best up-to-date White Elephant content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about whiteelephant.com

Discover a collection of luxury boutique hotels and resorts, each with local charm, elegance and style that reflect the vibe of Nantucket and Palm Beach, FL.

Visit whiteelephant.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Whiteelephant.com page load time and found that the first response time was 116 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

whiteelephant.com performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.2 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value11,800 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.061

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.6 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

whiteelephant.com

116 ms

www.whiteelephantresorts.com

104 ms

home.aspx

51 ms

js.aspx

351 ms

navis-fusion-loader.js

168 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Whiteelephant.com, 42% (14 requests) were made to Whiteelephantresorts.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (739 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 53.1 kB (49%)

Content Size

108.2 kB

After Optimization

55.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Whiteelephant.com main page is 108.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 67.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 52.9 kB

  • Original 67.7 kB
  • After minification 64.6 kB
  • After compression 14.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.9 kB or 78% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 140 B

  • Original 40.5 kB
  • After minification 40.5 kB
  • After compression 40.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (42%)

Requests Now

26

After Optimization

15

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of White Elephant. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

whiteelephant.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

whiteelephant.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

whiteelephant.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whiteelephant.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whiteelephant.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of White Elephant. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: