5.1 sec in total
829 ms
4.2 sec
74 ms
Visit whiteretouch.com now to see the best up-to-date White Retouch content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about whiteretouch.com
Photo Retouch & Edition Company in Barcelona. We provide creative retouching services for campaigns, editorials, lookbooks and e-commerce.
Visit whiteretouch.comWe analyzed Whiteretouch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 829 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
whiteretouch.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.6 s
0/100
10%
Value13.5 s
0/100
25%
Value18.9 s
0/100
10%
Value2,600 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.071
96/100
15%
Value17.0 s
4/100
10%
829 ms
31 ms
66 ms
205 ms
199 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Whiteretouch.com, 76% (38 requests) were made to Whiteretouch-b4f9.kxcdn.com and 12% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Whiteretouch-b4f9.kxcdn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 87.7 kB (3%)
2.8 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Whiteretouch.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 85.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 85.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. White Retouch images are well optimized though.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (81%)
42
8
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of White Retouch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
whiteretouch.com
829 ms
css
31 ms
js
66 ms
style.css
205 ms
ideamatic.css
199 ms
jquery.min.js
230 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
201 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
201 ms
custom.js
202 ms
api.js
41 ms
ideamatic.js
129 ms
jquery.cookie.js
206 ms
index.js
205 ms
index.js
205 ms
wpcf7r-fe.js
206 ms
encoder-form.js
205 ms
autosize.min.js
206 ms
cf7-material-design-bundle.js
253 ms
custom.unified.js
318 ms
common.js
206 ms
api.js
68 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
206 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
209 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
211 ms
index.js
231 ms
logo_white_retouch.png
640 ms
ico_arrow_up.png
628 ms
logo-cookieyes.svg
137 ms
style.min.css
238 ms
styles.css
230 ms
wpcf7-redirect-frontend.min.css
240 ms
cookie-law-info-public.css
242 ms
cookie-law-info-gdpr.css
245 ms
style.css
248 ms
settings.css
251 ms
cf7-material-design.css
328 ms
icon
35 ms
choices.min.css
339 ms
dashicons.min.css
344 ms
HOME-TABLET-jun-23-1554px.jpg
1493 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKd3vUDT.woff
225 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvUDT.woff
226 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKebukDT.woff
271 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiukDT.woff
275 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfFukDT.woff
274 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfsukDT.woff
274 ms
modules.ttf
265 ms
HOME-MOVIL-jun-23-614X800px.jpg
1288 ms
HOME-TABLET-jun-23-1554px2.jpg
1404 ms
cookie-law-info-table.css
408 ms
whiteretouch.com accessibility score
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
whiteretouch.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
whiteretouch.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whiteretouch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whiteretouch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
whiteretouch.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of White Retouch. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: