Tools & Wizards About Us
whitestackle.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

whitestackle.com

Site is undergoing maintenance

Page Load Speed

15.1 sec in total

First Response

57 ms

Resources Loaded

14.6 sec

Page Rendered

435 ms

whitestackle.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Whitestackle content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about whitestackle.com

My WordPress Blog

Visit whitestackle.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Whitestackle.com page load time and found that the first response time was 57 ms and then it took 15 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

whitestackle.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value13.9 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.251

49/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.4 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

whitestackle.com

57 ms

www.whitestackle.com

674 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

27 ms

style.min.css

75 ms

classic-themes.min.css

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Whitestackle.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (674 ms) belongs to the original domain Whitestackle.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (52%)

Content Size

3.9 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Whitestackle.com main page is 3.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 63.9 kB

  • Original 79.3 kB
  • After minification 78.3 kB
  • After compression 15.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 46.3 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Whitestackle images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 476.6 kB

  • Original 681.5 kB
  • After minification 680.6 kB
  • After compression 204.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 476.6 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 1.5 MB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB
  • After compression 202.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whitestackle.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (81%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whitestackle. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

whitestackle.com

whitestackle.com

57 ms

www.whitestackle.com

www.whitestackle.com

674 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

27 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

75 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

69 ms

foobox.free.min.css

foobox.free.min.css

96 ms

icomoon-the7-font.min.css

icomoon-the7-font.min.css

96 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

119 ms

back-compat.min.css

back-compat.min.css

99 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

204 ms

css

css

34 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

144 ms

custom-scrollbar.min.css

custom-scrollbar.min.css

121 ms

wpbakery.min.css

wpbakery.min.css

122 ms

post-type.min.css

post-type.min.css

154 ms

css-vars.css

css-vars.css

141 ms

custom.css

custom.css

218 ms

media.css

media.css

167 ms

mega-menu.css

mega-menu.css

167 ms

the7-elements-albums-portfolio.css

the7-elements-albums-portfolio.css

170 ms

post-type-dynamic.css

post-type-dynamic.css

171 ms

style.css

style.css

190 ms

csshero-static-style-whites-tackle.css

csshero-static-style-whites-tackle.css

191 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

193 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

196 ms

fitvid.js

fitvid.js

246 ms

fitvideoembed.js

fitvideoembed.js

247 ms

above-the-fold.min.js

above-the-fold.min.js

248 ms

foobox.free.min.js

foobox.free.min.js

253 ms

stripes.css

stripes.css

250 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

326 ms

legacy.min.js

legacy.min.js

250 ms

jquery-mousewheel.min.js

jquery-mousewheel.min.js

250 ms

custom-scrollbar.min.js

custom-scrollbar.min.js

251 ms

post-type.min.js

post-type.min.js

325 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

341 ms

css

css

26 ms

ga.js

ga.js

157 ms

website-background-edit-1024x683.jpg

website-background-edit-1024x683.jpg

162 ms

website-background-edit-scaled.jpg

website-background-edit-scaled.jpg

174 ms

whitestackle-logo-400b.png

whitestackle-logo-400b.png

162 ms

inshore.fly_.offshore-banner-TEXT-scaled.jpg

inshore.fly_.offshore-banner-TEXT-scaled.jpg

174 ms

font

font

75 ms

icomoon-the7-font.ttf

icomoon-the7-font.ttf

73 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

86 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

86 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

17 ms

Accessibility Review

whitestackle.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

whitestackle.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

whitestackle.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whitestackle.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whitestackle.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

whitestackle.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Whitestackle. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: