4.2 sec in total
165 ms
3.5 sec
603 ms
Visit whitewaterconstruction.com now to see the best up-to-date Whitewater Construction content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about whitewaterconstruction.com
Proudly Serving Richmond, IN Since 1983
Visit whitewaterconstruction.comWe analyzed Whitewaterconstruction.com page load time and found that the first response time was 165 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
whitewaterconstruction.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
58/100
10%
Value56.7 s
0/100
25%
Value29.3 s
0/100
10%
Value24,070 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.013
100/100
15%
Value46.3 s
0/100
10%
165 ms
1310 ms
29 ms
224 ms
636 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 26% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Whitewaterconstruction.com, 36% (26 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (8 requests) were made to Files.hellonetcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Whitewaterconstruction.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.6 MB (28%)
9.3 MB
6.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Whitewaterconstruction.com main page is 9.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 8.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 160.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 160.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Whitewater Construction needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.7 MB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 717.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 717.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 38.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whitewaterconstruction.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 38.0 kB or 49% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (65%)
43
15
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whitewater Construction. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
whitewaterconstruction.com
165 ms
whitewaterconstruction.com
1310 ms
style.css
29 ms
js
224 ms
all.js
636 ms
jquery.min.js
66 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
90 ms
scripts.min.js
148 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
109 ms
jquery.mobile.js
108 ms
common.js
108 ms
741 ms
logo.png
97 ms
Screen-Shot-2018-08-15-at-10.46.42-AM.png
562 ms
concrete_seamless.png
364 ms
cta01.jpg
262 ms
cta02.jpg
261 ms
Shawn-Sorrells-DSC_0089.jpg
313 ms
cta04.jpg
361 ms
P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk338xcDhrH.woff
262 ms
P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk338xcDhrE.ttf
361 ms
P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk37cxcDhrH.woff
385 ms
P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk37cxcDhrE.ttf
386 ms
P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk3M8tcDhrH.woff
385 ms
P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk3M8tcDhrE.ttf
410 ms
P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk3CstcDhrH.woff
384 ms
P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk3CstcDhrE.ttf
383 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVQ.woff
144 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
142 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVQ.woff
162 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
162 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVQ.woff
161 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
163 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVQ.woff
165 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
165 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVQ.woff
166 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVc.ttf
168 ms
modules.ttf
94 ms
P5sdzZCDf9_T_10c3i9MeUcyat4iJY-2RCrNfQA.woff
167 ms
P5sdzZCDf9_T_10c3i9MeUcyat4iJY-2RCrNfQM.ttf
429 ms
P5sdzZCDf9_T_10c3i9MeUcyat4iJY-ERCrNfQA.woff
168 ms
P5sdzZCDf9_T_10c3i9MeUcyat4iJY-ERCrNfQM.ttf
272 ms
P5sdzZCDf9_T_10c3i9MeUcyat4iJY9aQyrNfQA.woff
253 ms
P5sdzZCDf9_T_10c3i9MeUcyat4iJY9aQyrNfQM.ttf
256 ms
P5sdzZCDf9_T_10c3i9MeUcyat4iJY9jQyrNfQA.woff
251 ms
P5sdzZCDf9_T_10c3i9MeUcyat4iJY9jQyrNfQM.ttf
253 ms
analytics.js
124 ms
collect
176 ms
style.min.css
93 ms
css
158 ms
all.css
98 ms
video.6.13.0.js
284 ms
video-js.min.6.13.0.css
256 ms
videojs-contextmenu-ui.css
243 ms
rt-videojs-playlist-ui.css
245 ms
videojs-ie8.min.js
246 ms
videojs-playlist.min.js
266 ms
videojs-playlist-ui.min.js
270 ms
videojs-contextmenu.min.js
265 ms
videojs-contextmenu-ui.min.js
267 ms
CustomCCButton.js
239 ms
videojs-resolution-switcher-v7_20210303.js
382 ms
videojs-resolution-switcher-v7.css
264 ms
addthis_widget.js
245 ms
style.min.css
78 ms
unmute.png
115 ms
moatframe.js
685 ms
300lo.json
319 ms
inrich18_14_rev_iwd1.jpg
57 ms
sh.f48a1a04fe8dbf021b4cda1d.html
53 ms
universal_tracking.php
226 ms
AKZC3Y+AA==
0 ms
14.2dfb61b890959f78272d.js
14 ms
whitewaterconstruction.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
whitewaterconstruction.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
whitewaterconstruction.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whitewaterconstruction.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whitewaterconstruction.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
whitewaterconstruction.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Whitewater Construction. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: