6.4 sec in total
369 ms
4.5 sec
1.6 sec
Visit whitewatervethospital.com now to see the best up-to-date Whitewater Vet Hospital content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about whitewatervethospital.com
Visit whitewatervethospital.comWe analyzed Whitewatervethospital.com page load time and found that the first response time was 369 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
whitewatervethospital.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value21.2 s
0/100
25%
Value8.6 s
17/100
10%
Value670 ms
44/100
30%
Value0.279
43/100
15%
Value20.7 s
2/100
10%
369 ms
73 ms
295 ms
118 ms
54 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Whitewatervethospital.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Whitewatervethospital.com.
Page size can be reduced by 381.1 kB (7%)
5.1 MB
4.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Whitewatervethospital.com main page is 5.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 111.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 111.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 155.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Whitewater Vet Hospital images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 51.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 51.5 kB or 30% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 62.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whitewatervethospital.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 62.5 kB or 39% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (45%)
65
36
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whitewater Vet Hospital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
whitewatervethospital.com
369 ms
style.min.css
73 ms
styles.css
295 ms
style.css
118 ms
magnific-popup.css
54 ms
css
38 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
298 ms
jquery.min.js
84 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
131 ms
jquery.dd.js
147 ms
cc.main.js
155 ms
bt_elements.js
168 ms
slick.min.js
194 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
203 ms
iscroll.js
234 ms
fancySelect.js
224 ms
html5shiv.min.js
254 ms
respond.min.js
258 ms
misc.js
279 ms
header.misc.js
295 ms
dir.hover.js
320 ms
sliders.js
321 ms
comment-reply.min.js
455 ms
hooks.min.js
455 ms
i18n.min.js
472 ms
index.js
539 ms
index.js
604 ms
core.min.js
604 ms
datepicker.min.js
604 ms
html5-fallback.js
608 ms
bt_parallax.js
625 ms
Whitewater-text-logo.png
257 ms
Whitewater-text-logo-white.png
675 ms
AdobeStock_58147411-scaled.jpeg
838 ms
bg-office.jpg
675 ms
AdobeStock_443729068.jpeg
840 ms
AppStore.png
837 ms
Google-App2.png
840 ms
bgn-grad.png
992 ms
Dr.-Janet-Gildner.jpg
991 ms
Dr.-Matt-Stever.jpg
1143 ms
image-coming-soon1.png
1143 ms
Emily-Leistikow.jpg
1143 ms
Mary-Gillette.jpg
1144 ms
Sandy-Lucht.jpg
1284 ms
Rachael-Lusz.jpg
1285 ms
AdobeStock_615165535-320x213.jpeg
1285 ms
AdobeStock_93225549.2-320x214.jpg
1448 ms
AdobeStock_523731664-320x213.jpeg
1447 ms
AdobeStock_29702530-320x213.jpeg
1622 ms
AdobeStock_480987184-320x213.jpeg
1623 ms
AdobeStock_190019835-320x214.jpeg
1623 ms
AdobeStock_119409366-320x213.jpeg
1623 ms
AdobeStock_66630152-320x213.jpeg
1766 ms
AdobeStock_165662383-320x213.jpeg
1765 ms
AdobeStock_170844315-320x214.jpeg
1847 ms
AdobeStock_1568078-320x208.jpeg
1846 ms
AdobeStock_276674336-320x213.jpeg
1766 ms
font
19 ms
font
88 ms
Pe-icon-7-stroke.woff
1763 ms
btmedical.ttf
1850 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1864 ms
FontAwesome5Solid.ttf
1915 ms
Hospital-2.ttf
1799 ms
DQ9A8595-320x213.jpg
1795 ms
AdobeStock_297617812-320x213.jpeg
1793 ms
AdobeStock_64224019-1-320x213.jpeg
1892 ms
AdobeStock_79697545-320x218.jpeg
1829 ms
AdobeStock_543622895-1-320x213.jpeg
1875 ms
IMG_4932.2-scaled.jpg
1530 ms
print.css
52 ms
whitewatervethospital.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
whitewatervethospital.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
whitewatervethospital.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whitewatervethospital.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whitewatervethospital.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
whitewatervethospital.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Whitewater Vet Hospital. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: