Tools & Wizards About Us
whocalledme.xyz screenshot

Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

whocalledme.xyz

Page Load Speed

211 ms in total

First Response

103 ms

Resources Loaded

108 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

whocalledme.xyz screenshot

About Website

Visit whocalledme.xyz now to see the best up-to-date Whocalledme content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about whocalledme.xyz

Visit whocalledme.xyz

Key Findings

We analyzed Whocalledme.xyz page load time and found that the first response time was 103 ms and then it took 108 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

whocalledme.xyz performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

39/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.4 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

whocalledme.xyz

103 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Whocalledme.xyz and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (103 ms) belongs to the original domain Whocalledme.xyz.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 131 B (0%)

Content Size

62.6 kB

After Optimization

62.5 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Whocalledme.xyz main page is 62.6 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 62.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 107 B

  • Original 476 B
  • After minification 476 B
  • After compression 369 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107 B or 22% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 24 B

  • Original 62.2 kB
  • After minification 62.2 kB
  • After compression 62.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Network Requests Diagram

whocalledme.xyz

whocalledme.xyz

103 ms

Accessibility Review

whocalledme.xyz accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

whocalledme.xyz best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

whocalledme.xyz SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whocalledme.xyz can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Whocalledme.xyz main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

whocalledme.xyz

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Whocalledme. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: