1.7 sec in total
218 ms
1.3 sec
193 ms
Click here to check amazing Whocalledtome content for Poland. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about whocalledtome.com
Who called me. Check who calls to you. Mobile phones and Phone Number Lookup
Visit whocalledtome.comWe analyzed Whocalledtome.com page load time and found that the first response time was 218 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
whocalledtome.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.1 s
99/100
10%
Value1.1 s
100/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.1 s
100/100
10%
218 ms
186 ms
26 ms
6 ms
100 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Whocalledtome.com, 14% (8 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 9% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (409 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 72.1 kB (40%)
181.4 kB
109.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Whocalledtome.com main page is 181.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 115.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Whocalledtome needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.5 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 32.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.3 kB or 28% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whocalledtome.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (64%)
50
18
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whocalledtome. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
whocalledtome.com
218 ms
www.whocalledtome.com
186 ms
layout.css
26 ms
adsbygoogle.js
6 ms
gtm.js
100 ms
analytics.js
58 ms
sdk.js
56 ms
us.png
84 ms
en.png
100 ms
pl.png
100 ms
de.png
99 ms
fr.png
99 ms
it.png
98 ms
ru.png
97 ms
es.png
191 ms
sv.png
190 ms
zh.png
191 ms
hi.png
190 ms
img2.php
190 ms
img_s1.php
188 ms
img_s2.php
246 ms
img_s3.php
245 ms
arrow.gif
245 ms
img_s5.php
244 ms
ca-pub-7855266871959052.js
88 ms
zrt_lookup.html
180 ms
show_ads_impl.js
92 ms
collect
106 ms
168 ms
xd_arbiter.php
104 ms
xd_arbiter.php
150 ms
ads
286 ms
osd.js
29 ms
ads
213 ms
ads
203 ms
ads
259 ms
ads
409 ms
ads
302 ms
abg.js
35 ms
m_js_controller.js
5 ms
favicon
94 ms
s
58 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
153 ms
nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png
44 ms
x_button_blue2.png
58 ms
favicon
156 ms
favicon
141 ms
favicon
86 ms
favicon
111 ms
favicon
63 ms
favicon
64 ms
favicon
67 ms
favicon
106 ms
favicon
102 ms
favicon
65 ms
favicon
90 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
25 ms
whocalledtome.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
whocalledtome.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
whocalledtome.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
PL
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whocalledtome.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Whocalledtome.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
whocalledtome.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Whocalledtome. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: