1.7 sec in total
66 ms
1.6 sec
53 ms
Visit whole-picture.com now to see the best up-to-date Whole Picture content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about whole-picture.com
Creativity for the horse world and beyond. Photography, journalism, design by Heidi Nyland Melocco and her team. Available for family and wedding photography.
Visit whole-picture.comWe analyzed Whole-picture.com page load time and found that the first response time was 66 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
whole-picture.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
62/100
10%
Value7.1 s
5/100
25%
Value13.6 s
2/100
10%
Value1,340 ms
17/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value23.5 s
1/100
10%
66 ms
32 ms
30 ms
795 ms
59 ms
Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Whole-picture.com, 41% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 32% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (795 ms) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.
Page size can be reduced by 630.0 kB (52%)
1.2 MB
570.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Whole-picture.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 768.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 604.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 604.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Whole Picture needs image optimization as it can save up to 20.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (48%)
21
11
The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whole Picture. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.whole-picture.com
66 ms
minified.js
32 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
30 ms
polyfill.min.js
795 ms
thunderbolt-commons.60ed9a5a.bundle.min.js
59 ms
main.dda15fae.bundle.min.js
60 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
59 ms
lodash.min.js
58 ms
react.production.min.js
58 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
62 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
61 ms
11062b_2042bb7351284f0f982e4787d37415e6f000.jpg
88 ms
f6e948_33283d34cfd54cf5a1d04b582fcdd6dd~mv2.png
600 ms
irideonInsta.jpg
314 ms
Screen%20Shot%202017-08-08%20at%205_07_34%20PM.png
347 ms
f6e948_eb0d948580a74b04a5ee61174af272f5~mv2_d_2913_1970_s_2.jpg
349 ms
f6e948_d0e1f1f5426a4a94a72b407a86cc6602~mv2.jpg
400 ms
bundle.min.js
60 ms
4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff
10 ms
b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff
10 ms
6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff
6 ms
93 ms
92 ms
99 ms
99 ms
93 ms
91 ms
130 ms
126 ms
132 ms
126 ms
130 ms
129 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
26 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
6 ms
right-arrow.svg
6 ms
whole-picture.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
whole-picture.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
whole-picture.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whole-picture.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whole-picture.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
whole-picture.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Whole Picture. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: