19.3 sec in total
6.8 sec
12.2 sec
244 ms
Visit whosbuildingwhatwhere.com now to see the best up-to-date Whosbuildingwhatwhere content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about whosbuildingwhatwhere.com
«
Visit whosbuildingwhatwhere.comWe analyzed Whosbuildingwhatwhere.com page load time and found that the first response time was 6.8 sec and then it took 12.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
whosbuildingwhatwhere.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value10,990 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.059
98/100
15%
Value21.7 s
1/100
10%
6823 ms
330 ms
215 ms
166 ms
56 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Whosbuildingwhatwhere.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Whosbuildingwhatwhere.com.
Page size can be reduced by 389.4 kB (33%)
1.2 MB
793.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Whosbuildingwhatwhere.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 608.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Whosbuildingwhatwhere images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 171.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 171.6 kB or 54% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 154.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whosbuildingwhatwhere.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 154.6 kB or 72% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (36%)
50
32
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whosbuildingwhatwhere. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.whosbuildingwhatwhere.com
6823 ms
bY_RDoIwDEV_iK0SY3j3J3w0dStSLRvSkbC_dwTUaHxre0962hocDsl1CE4VNGWh6gAetWMXg9qeQ1V_MZ70nuJwXtmSxZDQJdPGsTcNcHAyFeazT6sdnLqox4nFc7hulp_hgrdCswp7Gv-mRUQisTgJNZsWg8uXOMO7uD0mGrN99aa2e9tsLyhekAFVKa239chhyZ4.css
330 ms
M9QvTkxKzNRPLC5OLSnWTy4u1k_LzyvRTSxPLc7PTdXLzcwDAA.css
215 ms
fcwxDoAgDAXQC6mVK3gJ5woEm1BK-DB4ex0cjfvLcwQ-WOYgLfpu7SIGYgd5gJSlLCplcq-qLCELupSEX5jMUo7K9ZuttJ-GbUgOT0V-oJve.css
166 ms
plusone.js
56 ms
M9bPKixNLarUMYYydHMz04sSS1L1cjPzAA.js
237 ms
bcqxEYMwDAXQhTCGFVgiJafYwnxiZJAFF7bn0qXg1a_3gTYLM_ml-kmL2MgSxxoUmzWdf82lDgdyhKRf-fD1LqTRYaXETuhEIkORh7vsB-vVTpm_NSOyuhVP7y9AYDc.js
215 ms
css
27 ms
adsbygoogle.js
23 ms
M9RPzs8rSUwu0U3LL8rVNdfPzEvOKU1JLdbPAqLC0tSiSj2QjF5uZh4A.js
219 ms
dU1LDsIgEL0QMBJNuvcSrilMLZUBZCAtt7cadaW7938abIrV2CqnVEgO4KMNzSHDwsC2-FxZHOAyJz43H5yP15dDJgRJGJs4wZol0ohOkY9CAxrucjLR9jFt8AXLvWHp6sOlVkc1_Ky8k7u4v6ls7O1fhFJjXGfE8Bx6AA.js
237 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
33 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
110 ms
bg.jpg
587 ms
site_logo.jpg
237 ms
IMG_6792-80x80.jpg
232 ms
600housesparrow1024-80x80.jpg
233 ms
art_gallery_room-80x80.jpg
232 ms
help-80x80.jpg
234 ms
30046d87d4db77bd7a1441608237e8ef.jpg
240 ms
bc87a1a3473272bbc7e5816feba360ba.jpg
240 ms
9f32d7353ebe32e8945bf7da8267c2b6.jpg
235 ms
e411269e1eb0f3509d01b5b994eae52c.png
241 ms
3d6772ae74d4f3543628b07df8fc7bf5.jpg
307 ms
e7a38bd690dcb082a48f9fbc10c8f125.jpg
306 ms
3ede64f859d5685fe65dace29f624d12.jpg
315 ms
f0dee570befa689cf1336493c18f0bbf.jpg
312 ms
17146211d60a28b7ec9b530135b39c85.jpg
309 ms
fb.jpg
392 ms
tw.jpg
392 ms
pi.jpg
393 ms
ig.jpg
393 ms
all.js
270 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xJhsE6jcpsD2oq89kgohWx0.ttf
29 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xD1GzwQ5qF9DNzkQQVRhJ4g.ttf
30 ms
ca-pub-2353848232962213.js
202 ms
zrt_lookup.html
59 ms
show_ads_impl.js
59 ms
analytics.js
23 ms
collect
140 ms
ads
293 ms
osd.js
8 ms
131 ms
xd_arbiter.php
224 ms
xd_arbiter.php
431 ms
m_js_controller.js
23 ms
abg.js
41 ms
favicon
45 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
38 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
31 ms
s
20 ms
x_button_blue2.png
9 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
11 ms
ui
39 ms
whosbuildingwhatwhere.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
whosbuildingwhatwhere.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
whosbuildingwhatwhere.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whosbuildingwhatwhere.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whosbuildingwhatwhere.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
whosbuildingwhatwhere.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Whosbuildingwhatwhere. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: