2.8 sec in total
278 ms
2.4 sec
143 ms
Welcome to whoseview.ie homepage info - get ready to check Whoseview best content for Ireland right away, or after learning these important things about whoseview.ie
Simple User Based Review Websites For Contractors We provide basic yet effective website solutions for contractors that want to advertise, gain customer feedback and highlight their services throughou...
Visit whoseview.ieWe analyzed Whoseview.ie page load time and found that the first response time was 278 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
whoseview.ie performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value3.9 s
53/100
25%
Value6.6 s
38/100
10%
Value290 ms
80/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value4.7 s
80/100
10%
278 ms
1151 ms
89 ms
187 ms
232 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Whoseview.ie, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Whoseview.ie.
Page size can be reduced by 74.4 kB (15%)
496.1 kB
421.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Whoseview.ie main page is 496.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 149.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Whoseview images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 16.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 16.1 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whoseview.ie has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (76%)
38
9
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Whoseview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
whoseview.ie
278 ms
www.whoseview.ie
1151 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
89 ms
style.min.css
187 ms
12-layout.css
232 ms
child-theme-generator-public.css
242 ms
cookie-law-info-public.css
247 ms
cookie-law-info-gdpr.css
248 ms
menu-image.css
247 ms
dashicons.min.css
335 ms
ksm-testimonials.min.css
308 ms
style.css
321 ms
style.css
329 ms
all.min.css
329 ms
font-icons.min.css
330 ms
style.css
384 ms
bbuikit.theme.min.css
578 ms
navigation-branding.min.css
410 ms
css
31 ms
jquery.min.js
501 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
413 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
418 ms
child-theme-generator-public.js
458 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
492 ms
uikit.min.js
631 ms
uikit-icons.min.js
526 ms
cookie-law-info-table.css
534 ms
masonry.min.js
629 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
630 ms
jquery.ba-throttle-debounce.min.js
679 ms
12-layout.js
679 ms
main.min.js
701 ms
wp-embed.min.js
703 ms
whoseview.png
121 ms
whoseview.png
172 ms
an-All-Stone-cleaning-paving-4-400x200.jpg
118 ms
roof-services-stillorgan-6-400x267.jpg
170 ms
artane-roofs-gutters-repairs-7-400x267.jpg
170 ms
roofing-repair-400x267.jpg
121 ms
Cleaning-roofs-driveways-Waterford-400x200.jpg
119 ms
whoseview.png
112 ms
whoseview.ie accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
whoseview.ie best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
whoseview.ie SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whoseview.ie can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whoseview.ie main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
whoseview.ie
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Whoseview. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: