3.3 sec in total
187 ms
2.8 sec
353 ms
Visit whoznext.com now to see the best up-to-date Who Znext content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about whoznext.com
With WhoZnext, you'll never not know your place in line at your favorite barbershop, nail salon, restaurant, and much more. From our app or website, you can browse businesses, check their lines, put y...
Visit whoznext.comWe analyzed Whoznext.com page load time and found that the first response time was 187 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
whoznext.com performance score
187 ms
697 ms
166 ms
113 ms
196 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Whoznext.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (972 ms) belongs to the original domain Whoznext.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (65%)
1.9 MB
668.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Whoznext.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.8 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Who Znext images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 866.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 866.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 325.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Whoznext.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 325.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (58%)
59
25
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Who Znext. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
whoznext.com
187 ms
www.whoznext.com
697 ms
style.css
166 ms
colorbox.css
113 ms
main.css
196 ms
responsive.css
193 ms
uploadify.css
148 ms
uploadifive.css
208 ms
jquery-ui.css
283 ms
jquery.timepicker.css
277 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
535 ms
ajax.js
366 ms
jstz.js
342 ms
sitecommon.js
337 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
438 ms
additional-methods.min.js
393 ms
jquery.uploadify.js
600 ms
jquery.uploadifive.js
568 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
475 ms
project_validate.js
508 ms
common.js
568 ms
modernizr.custom.js
605 ms
jquery-ui.js
972 ms
touch_punch.js
679 ms
jquery.timepicker.js
730 ms
masking.js
693 ms
css
25 ms
js
40 ms
jquery-ui.css
5 ms
wowslider.js
789 ms
style.css
731 ms
script.js
786 ms
background-img.jpg
245 ms
login.png
123 ms
signup.png
131 ms
logo.png
191 ms
nav_bg.png
381 ms
css
16 ms
KzHY9N-PIagGI86CpWfnZA.ttf
66 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
67 ms
heading-text.png
132 ms
barber.png
232 ms
img_2.png
253 ms
img_3.png
299 ms
img_4.png
302 ms
img_5.png
323 ms
img_6.png
336 ms
img_7.png
366 ms
img_8.png
397 ms
right_arrow.png
439 ms
badge_android.png
482 ms
badge_ios.png
462 ms
waiting_popup.gif
525 ms
vedio-bg.jpg
857 ms
box_shadow.png
846 ms
social_icons_new.png
560 ms
yDmCtDaf20U
101 ms
analytics.js
31 ms
overlay.png
529 ms
collect
12 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
22 ms
www-embed-player.js
41 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
42 ms
ad_status.js
39 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
69 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
69 ms
whoznext.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Whoznext.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Whoznext.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
whoznext.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Who Znext. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: