3.4 sec in total
494 ms
2.7 sec
188 ms
Click here to check amazing Widgets content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about widgets.mu
Widgets.Mu is your one-stop-shop to the best in Adobe Muse CC widgets, tutorials, services, and tools.
Visit widgets.muWe analyzed Widgets.mu page load time and found that the first response time was 494 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
widgets.mu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
47/100
10%
Value3.6 s
60/100
25%
Value3.1 s
93/100
10%
Value100 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value3.6 s
91/100
10%
494 ms
533 ms
401 ms
204 ms
208 ms
Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Widgets.mu and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Widgets.mu.
Page size can be reduced by 82.0 kB (55%)
149.9 kB
67.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Widgets.mu main page is 149.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 66.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Widgets needs image optimization as it can save up to 15.3 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 9.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.5 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 53.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Widgets.mu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 53.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
8
8
The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Widgets. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
widgets.mu
494 ms
widgets.mu
533 ms
styles.css
401 ms
script.js
204 ms
WidgetsIconHeader.png
208 ms
headerhero.svg
202 ms
widgetsmu.553fcd8ff392f.MunchMenu.icon.png
337 ms
widgetsmu.552d71eb6e733.TumblrBlog.icon.png
405 ms
widgetsmu.54d3cb424e3e8.ScrollableTextFrames.icon.png
538 ms
RotationScrollEffects.png
582 ms
SourceSansPro-Black.ttf
764 ms
SourceSansPro-Bold.ttf
779 ms
SourceSansPro-Semibold.ttf
888 ms
SourceSansPro-Regular.ttf
941 ms
SourceSansPro-Light.ttf
1160 ms
SourceSansPro-ExtraLight.ttf
1172 ms
Pacifico.ttf
1153 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1207 ms
widgets.mu accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
widgets.mu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
widgets.mu SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Widgets.mu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Widgets.mu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
widgets.mu
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Widgets. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: