1 sec in total
116 ms
823 ms
77 ms
Welcome to wightshipyard.com homepage info - get ready to check Wight Shipyard best content right away, or after learning these important things about wightshipyard.com
British shipyard specialising in aluminium vessel construction, high speed ferries, refits and planned maintenance.
Visit wightshipyard.comWe analyzed Wightshipyard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 116 ms and then it took 900 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
wightshipyard.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
86/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value4.8 s
68/100
10%
Value510 ms
57/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value14.2 s
9/100
10%
116 ms
133 ms
123 ms
185 ms
252 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Wightshipyard.com, 45% (14 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 29% (9 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (414 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 405.1 kB (69%)
584.3 kB
179.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Wightshipyard.com main page is 584.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 496.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 404.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 404.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wight Shipyard images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 644 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (30%)
20
14
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wight Shipyard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.wightshipyard.com
116 ms
bt
133 ms
minified.js
123 ms
fetch.umd.js
185 ms
bolt-custom-elements.min.js
252 ms
requirejs.min.js
254 ms
wix-perf-measure.bundle.min.js
251 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
250 ms
452e60_487e960bbb844cf48305d20e9b7ecf14~mv2.jpg
368 ms
dbbdc91820535cbbeb0664011cb93255.png
103 ms
bolt-performance
167 ms
post-list-widget-viewer.min.css
248 ms
452e60_88def183e06648f6875ee50e5b8dbed0.jpg
378 ms
11062b_64ae2a899006496dac01c2e81fac97f1f000.jpg
264 ms
ISO%2014001.jpg
414 ms
ISO%209001.jpg
333 ms
452e60_4ec41613ce564f1088d2eb6b3497789b~mv2.png
406 ms
dynamicmodel
155 ms
wixcode-worker.js
176 ms
bt
74 ms
452e60_762b76d1a07643fa896a1af6ce494605~mv2.jpg
142 ms
452e60_762b76d1a07643fa896a1af6ce494605~mv2.jpg
192 ms
opensans-regular-webfont.woff
71 ms
opensans-bold-webfont.woff
71 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff
106 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrc.woff
112 ms
opensans-italic-webfont.woff
44 ms
opensans-bolditalic-webfont.woff
45 ms
4021a3b9-f782-438b-aeb4-c008109a8b64.woff
44 ms
b56b944e-bbe0-4450-a241-de2125d3e682.woff
44 ms
6f8d1983-4d34-4fa4-9110-988f6c495757.woff
44 ms
wightshipyard.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
wightshipyard.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
wightshipyard.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wightshipyard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wightshipyard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wightshipyard.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wight Shipyard. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: