Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

wildlifegardenproject.com

Wildlife Garden Project CIC – Learn how to provide food, shelter and breeding spots for the wildlife in your garden

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

188 ms

wildlifegardenproject.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to wildlifegardenproject.com homepage info - get ready to check Wildlife Garden Project best content right away, or after learning these important things about wildlifegardenproject.com

Visit wildlifegardenproject.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Wildlifegardenproject.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wildlifegardenproject.com performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

35/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.8 s

78/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

wildlifegardenproject.com

1141 ms

8ffc485676366c6893ac07ed26dfe557.js

500 ms

mootools-yui-compressed.js

10 ms

joomgallery.css

170 ms

joom_local.css

169 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Wildlifegardenproject.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Use.edgefonts.net and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Wildlifegardenproject.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 46.2 kB (55%)

Content Size

84.3 kB

After Optimization

38.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Wildlifegardenproject.com main page is 84.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 67.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 46.2 kB

  • Original 67.2 kB
  • After minification 66.2 kB
  • After compression 21.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.2 kB or 69% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (56%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

24

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wildlife Garden Project. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

wildlifegardenproject.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Best Practices

wildlifegardenproject.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

wildlifegardenproject.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wildlifegardenproject.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wildlifegardenproject.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Wildlife Garden Project. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: