1 sec in total
133 ms
758 ms
154 ms
Visit windowpath.com now to see the best up-to-date Windowpath content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about windowpath.com
Visit windowpath.comWe analyzed Windowpath.com page load time and found that the first response time was 133 ms and then it took 912 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
windowpath.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value3.0 s
77/100
25%
Value4.0 s
81/100
10%
Value2,370 ms
5/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.8 s
28/100
10%
133 ms
49 ms
87 ms
162 ms
126 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Windowpath.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (368 ms) belongs to the original domain Windowpath.com.
Page size can be reduced by 179.1 kB (20%)
905.6 kB
726.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Windowpath.com main page is 905.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 676.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 9.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Windowpath images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 136.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 136.8 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Windowpath.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.8 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (65%)
40
14
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Windowpath. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
windowpath.com
133 ms
main.css
49 ms
mobile.css
87 ms
jquery.js
162 ms
cufon-yui.js
126 ms
League_Gothic_400.font.js
162 ms
Akzidenz_Grotesk_Roman_400.font.js
127 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
131 ms
screen.css
87 ms
reset.css
48 ms
scratch.css
69 ms
body.png
56 ms
bullet.gif
55 ms
icon-design.png
56 ms
icon-dev.png
52 ms
icon-seo.png
57 ms
icon-ecom.png
55 ms
icon-cms.png
125 ms
icon-maint.png
125 ms
icon-host.png
121 ms
call-box-phone.png
123 ms
logo.png
121 ms
nav-div.png
123 ms
banner-top.png
139 ms
banner-middle.png
146 ms
featured-curly.png
147 ms
banner-bottom.png
145 ms
banner-body.png
148 ms
banner-1.png
265 ms
banner-2.png
368 ms
banner-3.png
301 ms
banner-4.png
266 ms
content-top.png
190 ms
content-middle.png
189 ms
nav.png
234 ms
box-portfolio.png
233 ms
arrow.gif
276 ms
box-contact.png
277 ms
content-bottom.png
306 ms
ga.js
31 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
windowpath.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
windowpath.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
windowpath.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Windowpath.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Windowpath.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
windowpath.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Windowpath. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: