Tools & Wizards About Us
windowsfront.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 91

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

windowsfront.com

首页- 静流书站 免费图书 pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

490 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

901 ms

windowsfront.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to windowsfront.com homepage info - get ready to check Windowsfront best content for China right away, or after learning these important things about windowsfront.com

静流书站 免费图书 pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载

Visit windowsfront.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Windowsfront.com page load time and found that the first response time was 490 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

windowsfront.com performance score

91

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

87/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.172

69/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

windowsfront.com

490 ms

windowsfront.com

300 ms

bootstrap.min.css

134 ms

wait.css

199 ms

media.css

200 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Windowsfront.com, 8% (1 request) were made to Statcounter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (490 ms) belongs to the original domain Windowsfront.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 52.9 kB (58%)

Content Size

91.8 kB

After Optimization

38.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Windowsfront.com main page is 91.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 53.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 44.3 kB

  • Original 53.9 kB
  • After minification 49.8 kB
  • After compression 9.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 2.9 kB
  • After minification 2.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Windowsfront images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.7 kB
  • After minification 1.7 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 8.6 kB

  • Original 33.3 kB
  • After minification 33.3 kB
  • After compression 24.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Windowsfront.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (36%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Windowsfront. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

windowsfront.com

windowsfront.com

490 ms

windowsfront.com

windowsfront.com

300 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

134 ms

wait.css

wait.css

199 ms

media.css

media.css

200 ms

pix1.jpg

pix1.jpg

213 ms

pix2.jpg

pix2.jpg

213 ms

pix.jpg

pix.jpg

213 ms

jquery.slim.min.js

jquery.slim.min.js

328 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

326 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

340 ms

jquery.lazy.min.js

jquery.lazy.min.js

326 ms

counter.js

counter.js

30 ms

Accessibility Review

windowsfront.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

windowsfront.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

windowsfront.com SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    ZH

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Windowsfront.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Windowsfront.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

windowsfront.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Windowsfront. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: