Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

wishbird.net

Wishbird ahora es Living La Vida — Living La Vida - México

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

684 ms

wishbird.net screenshot

About Website

Visit wishbird.net now to see the best up-to-date Wishbird content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wishbird.net

Wishbird tiene un nuevo nombre, Living La Vida. la tienda en línea de experiencias originales más grande de México. Conoce Cásate conmigo, Discover, Escapada, Explore, Gourmet, Relax, Romance y nuestr...

Visit wishbird.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Wishbird.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

wishbird.net performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,420 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.8 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.wishbird.com.mx

1092 ms

9f5bee577b715bcd42e4eb26111baa42_1457572055.css

52 ms

prototype.js

32 ms

ccard.js

31 ms

validation.js

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 155 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Wishbird.net, 5% (8 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 3% (5 requests) were made to Static.olark.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Wishbird.com.mx.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (48%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Wishbird.net main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 974.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 110.1 kB

  • Original 132.0 kB
  • After minification 116.8 kB
  • After compression 21.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.2 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 110.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 57.3 kB

  • Original 969.6 kB
  • After minification 912.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wishbird images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 679.3 kB

  • Original 974.6 kB
  • After minification 828.0 kB
  • After compression 295.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 679.3 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 367.8 kB

  • Original 441.8 kB
  • After minification 355.7 kB
  • After compression 74.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wishbird.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 367.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 86 (63%)

Requests Now

137

After Optimization

51

The browser has sent 137 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wishbird. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 53 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

wishbird.net accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

wishbird.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

wishbird.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wishbird.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Wishbird.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wishbird. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: