4.4 sec in total
1.6 sec
2.4 sec
412 ms
Visit womenofgraphicdesign.org now to see the best up-to-date Womenofgraphicdesign content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about womenofgraphicdesign.org
DropCatch.com helps you secure expiring domain names.
Visit womenofgraphicdesign.orgWe analyzed Womenofgraphicdesign.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
womenofgraphicdesign.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value5.4 s
20/100
25%
Value8.8 s
16/100
10%
Value5,190 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value10.5 s
23/100
10%
1592 ms
38 ms
24 ms
46 ms
47 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Womenofgraphicdesign.org, 25% (14 requests) were made to 40.media.tumblr.com and 14% (8 requests) were made to 41.media.tumblr.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Womenofgraphicdesign.org.
Page size can be reduced by 562.4 kB (24%)
2.4 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Womenofgraphicdesign.org main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 120.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 120.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Womenofgraphicdesign images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 358.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 358.7 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 39.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Womenofgraphicdesign.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39.9 kB or 56% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (25%)
51
38
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Womenofgraphicdesign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
womenofgraphicdesign.org
1592 ms
pre_tumblelog.js
38 ms
css
24 ms
precrafted-social.css
46 ms
flat-pack-styles.css
47 ms
tumblelog_post_message_queue.js
33 ms
jquery.min.js
40 ms
flat-pack-plugins.js
99 ms
flat-pack-app.js
98 ms
index.js
171 ms
dc.js
322 ms
tumblr_o4428uvs0e1spitb2o1_500.jpg
315 ms
tumblr_o4428uvs0e1spitb2o3_500.jpg
323 ms
like_iframe.html
308 ms
count.js
313 ms
tumblr_o45gkrNHez1spitb2o1_500.jpg
500 ms
tumblr_o3efzoVy9E1spitb2o1_500.gif
292 ms
tumblr_o4428uvs0e1spitb2o2_500.jpg
280 ms
tumblr_o49ej7GVxC1spitb2o2_500.jpg
283 ms
tumblr_o3ytziRAqF1spitb2o2_500.jpg
343 ms
tumblr_o3yuq4M4aD1spitb2o3_500.jpg
281 ms
tumblr_o3yud4mFCE1spitb2o1_500.jpg
342 ms
tumblr_o3qmxyPohH1qa4ub3o1_500.jpg
340 ms
tumblr_o40dzhq8uJ1spitb2o1_500.jpg
342 ms
tumblr_o3i939s7Wx1spitb2o1_r1_500.jpg
525 ms
tumblr_o3ei9sPpX81spitb2o1_500.jpg
469 ms
tumblr_o3ei9sPpX81spitb2o3_500.jpg
526 ms
tumblr_o3ei9sPpX81spitb2o2_500.jpg
526 ms
tumblr_o3efa8Av941spitb2o3_500.jpg
467 ms
tumblr_o3t3exKRlT1spitb2o1_500.jpg
468 ms
tumblr_o49ej7GVxC1spitb2o1_500.jpg
276 ms
tumblr_o3ytziRAqF1spitb2o1_500.jpg
275 ms
tumblr_o3wzojl08D1spitb2o1_500.jpg
271 ms
tumblr_o3wzojl08D1spitb2o2_500.jpg
273 ms
tumblr_o3yuq4M4aD1spitb2o1_500.jpg
273 ms
tumblr_o3yuq4M4aD1spitb2o4_500.jpg
274 ms
tumblr_o3t4rySpLn1spitb2o1_500.jpg
275 ms
impixu
386 ms
impixu
447 ms
tumblr_static_erslq5rfpnkkgsck40sck0wo4_2048_v2.jpg
230 ms
analytics.html
288 ms
login_check.html
92 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
219 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcgFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff
219 ms
4WwBI2xBQBE
31 ms
precrafted-social.woff
212 ms
__utm.gif
197 ms
avatar_ab819206480b_40.png
99 ms
iframe_logo.png
93 ms
rapid-3.36.js
73 ms
rapidworker-1.2.js
72 ms
ga.js
60 ms
analytics.js
94 ms
cs.js
38 ms
__utm.gif
22 ms
cedexis.radar.js
5 ms
womenofgraphicdesign.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
womenofgraphicdesign.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
womenofgraphicdesign.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Womenofgraphicdesign.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Womenofgraphicdesign.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
womenofgraphicdesign.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Womenofgraphicdesign. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: