2.3 sec in total
333 ms
1.3 sec
700 ms
Welcome to wong.digital homepage info - get ready to check Wong best content right away, or after learning these important things about wong.digital
We design B2B brands and experiences for humans. Impeccable craft is our signature. We've worked with over 30 Fortune 500 companies in the past 20 years.
Visit wong.digitalWe analyzed Wong.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 333 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
wong.digital performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
41/100
10%
Value9.6 s
0/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.0 s
34/100
10%
333 ms
77 ms
42 ms
39 ms
70 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Wong.digital, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.shortpixel.ai. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (427 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.shortpixel.ai.
Page size can be reduced by 165.2 kB (22%)
765.5 kB
600.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Wong.digital main page is 765.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 409.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 161.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 161.3 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 324 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wong.digital has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (91%)
54
5
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wong. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wong.digital
333 ms
css
77 ms
style.min.css
42 ms
unsemantic-grid.min.css
39 ms
style.min.css
70 ms
mobile.min.css
59 ms
font-icons.min.css
56 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
63 ms
frontend-legacy.min.css
48 ms
frontend.min.css
50 ms
swiper.min.css
65 ms
frontend.min.css
65 ms
frontend.min.css
104 ms
all.min.css
125 ms
v4-shims.min.css
123 ms
addthis_wordpress_public.min.css
102 ms
css
131 ms
fontawesome.min.css
136 ms
solid.min.css
135 ms
brands.min.css
134 ms
jquery.min.js
133 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
165 ms
rbtools.min.js
168 ms
rs6.min.js
168 ms
v4-shims.min.js
171 ms
animations.min.css
169 ms
rs6.css
192 ms
ai-2.0.min.js
216 ms
menu.min.js
169 ms
addthis_widget.js
346 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
213 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
212 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
211 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
212 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
214 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
216 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
218 ms
hooks.min.js
215 ms
i18n.min.js
216 ms
vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015
161 ms
frontend.min.js
217 ms
waypoints.min.js
212 ms
core.min.js
207 ms
swiper.min.js
194 ms
share-link.min.js
192 ms
dialog.min.js
274 ms
frontend.min.js
271 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
270 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
269 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
230 ms
frontend.min.js
217 ms
tooltipster.min.js
199 ms
gtm.js
253 ms
WD-background.svg
427 ms
logo-grid.svg
388 ms
font
67 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
427 ms
wong.digital accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
wong.digital best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
wong.digital SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
![]()
EN
![]()
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wong.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wong.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wong.digital
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wong. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: