2.9 sec in total
145 ms
1.9 sec
867 ms
Welcome to woodworkingbay.com homepage info - get ready to check Woodworking Bay best content right away, or after learning these important things about woodworkingbay.com
Slide 1 HeadingClick HereSlide 2 HeadingClick HereSlide 3 HeadingClick Here Previous Next The Best Jobsite Woodwork Equipment Solutions Reviewed (Suitable for all budgets) | Woodworking Bay
Visit woodworkingbay.comWe analyzed Woodworkingbay.com page load time and found that the first response time was 145 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
woodworkingbay.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value13.7 s
0/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value580 ms
51/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value13.9 s
10/100
10%
145 ms
768 ms
59 ms
96 ms
79 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Woodworkingbay.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (768 ms) belongs to the original domain Woodworkingbay.com.
Page size can be reduced by 92.7 kB (5%)
2.1 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Woodworkingbay.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 92.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Woodworking Bay images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 204 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 157 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Woodworkingbay.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (66%)
61
21
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Woodworking Bay. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
woodworkingbay.com
145 ms
woodworkingbay.com
768 ms
adsbygoogle.js
59 ms
js
96 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
79 ms
css
34 ms
all.min.css
119 ms
screen.min.css
167 ms
all.min.css
167 ms
default.min.css
172 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
170 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
222 ms
post-2177.css
172 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
220 ms
post-2171.css
219 ms
font-awesome.min.css
226 ms
core.css
228 ms
sticky.min.css
229 ms
navigation-branding.min.css
272 ms
frontend.min.css
272 ms
css
73 ms
fontawesome.min.css
276 ms
solid.min.css
275 ms
jquery.min.js
331 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
281 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
324 ms
widget-posts.min.css
324 ms
sticky.min.js
328 ms
front.min.js
386 ms
menu.min.js
385 ms
navigation-search.min.js
386 ms
back-to-top.min.js
386 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
387 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
387 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
387 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
392 ms
frontend.min.js
433 ms
waypoints.min.js
431 ms
core.min.js
435 ms
frontend.min.js
437 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
438 ms
underscore.min.js
441 ms
wp-util.min.js
401 ms
frontend.min.js
370 ms
pexels-los-muertos-crew-8447773-scaled.jpg
57 ms
pexels-ivan-samkov-5799137-scaled.jpg
106 ms
pexels-anna-shvets-4312856-scaled.jpg
105 ms
Liquid-Termite-Treatment-Vs-Bait-Station-300x157.jpg
159 ms
Best-Termite-Treatment-Do-It-Yourself-300x157.jpg
159 ms
Amir-Maqbool1-300x157.jpg
160 ms
How-To-Protect-Cedar-Wood-300x157.jpg
160 ms
Best-Axe-For-Splitting-Wood-300x157.jpg
185 ms
How-To-Cut-Hinges-For-Doors-300x157.jpg
188 ms
pexels-bidvine-1249611-300x200.jpg
191 ms
pexels-tima-miroshnichenko-6790821-300x200.jpg
192 ms
pexels-ono-kosuki-5974033-1-300x179.jpg
195 ms
Worx-Pegasus-300x169.jpg
197 ms
article-photo-900-600-px-300x200.webp
238 ms
bits-300x225.jpg
239 ms
brad-300x200.jpeg
244 ms
Remove.jpeg
245 ms
stain-brand-300x214.jpeg
247 ms
weathered-deck-1-300x200.jpg
250 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
15 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
20 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
28 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
29 ms
eicons.woff
472 ms
pexels-los-muertos-crew-8447773-scaled.jpg
447 ms
pexels-anna-shvets-4312856-scaled.jpg
508 ms
pexels-ivan-samkov-5799137-scaled.jpg
455 ms
woodworkingbay.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
woodworkingbay.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
woodworkingbay.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Woodworkingbay.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Woodworkingbay.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
woodworkingbay.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Woodworking Bay. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: