4.7 sec in total
105 ms
473 ms
4.1 sec
Visit wordpress.cm now to see the best up-to-date Word Press content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about wordpress.cm
Build a site, sell online, earn with your content, and more
Visit wordpress.cmWe analyzed Wordpress.cm page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
wordpress.cm performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value5.3 s
59/100
10%
Value370 ms
71/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.5 s
18/100
10%
105 ms
20 ms
29 ms
30 ms
48 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Wordpress.cm, 57% (31 requests) were made to Wordpress.com and 13% (7 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (238 ms) relates to the external source Wordpress.com.
Page size can be reduced by 381.3 kB (6%)
6.2 MB
5.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Wordpress.cm main page is 6.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 242.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 242.4 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 138.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Word Press images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 525 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (24%)
46
35
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Word Press. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
wordpress.cm
105 ms
wordpress.cm
20 ms
wordpress.com
29 ms
30 ms
css2
48 ms
bundle.js
33 ms
31 ms
w.js
32 ms
bilmur.min.js
16 ms
def-queue.js
31 ms
globe-blue.svg
142 ms
theme-1-2x-2-optimized.webp
238 ms
g.gif
170 ms
a8c-analytics.js
175 ms
206 ms
left-line-3x.png
148 ms
right-line-3x.png
148 ms
vip-logo-2.webp
157 ms
g.gif
157 ms
g.gif
160 ms
theme-2-2x-2-optimized.webp
191 ms
theme-3-2x-3-optimized.webp
157 ms
theme-11-2x-optimized.webp
163 ms
theme-12-2x-optimized.webp
164 ms
theme-3-2-2x-optimized.webp
163 ms
theme-19-2-2x-optimized.webp
193 ms
theme-4-2x-2-optimized.webp
198 ms
theme-5-2x-2-optimized.webp
192 ms
theme-6-2x-2-optimized.webp
195 ms
theme-14-2x-optimized.webp
196 ms
theme-15-2x-optimized.webp
200 ms
theme-mobile-1-2x-optimized.webp
195 ms
theme-mobile-2-2x-optimized.webp
198 ms
theme-mobile-3-2x-optimized.webp
199 ms
theme-mobile-4-2x-optimized.webp
200 ms
theme-mobile-5-2x-optimized.webp
202 ms
theme-mobile-6-2x-optimized.webp
204 ms
theme-mobile-7-2x-optimized.webp
201 ms
theme-mobile-8-2x-optimized.webp
201 ms
theme-mobile-9-2x-optimized.webp
203 ms
400.woff
110 ms
b.gif
74 ms
t.gif
78 ms
i7dPIFZifjKcF5UAWdDRUEY.ttf
78 ms
t.gif
77 ms
t.gif
76 ms
group-1000004724.png
117 ms
migration-image-right-side-_1_optimized.png
72 ms
lohp-i3-hero-2x.png
75 ms
wp-migration-icon-2x.png
74 ms
play-store-logo.png
73 ms
left-line-3x.png
63 ms
right-line-3x.png
62 ms
vip-logo-2.webp
54 ms
wordpress.cm accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
wordpress.cm best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
wordpress.cm SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wordpress.cm can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wordpress.cm main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wordpress.cm
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Word Press. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: